From Deseret News archives:

Casting a vote of confidence in Utah elections

Published: Sunday, Nov. 4, 2007 12:07 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Legend has it that Calvin Coolidge, while lieutenant governor of Massachusetts, once approached a man at a gathering and said, "Hello, I'm Lt. Gov. Calvin Coolidge."

The man answered, "So, what is it that a lieutenant governor does?"

Coolidge said, "I just did it."

Whether or not the story is true, Gary Herbert can relate.

If the name doesn't ring a bell, Herbert is Utah's lieutenant governor. Voters elected him along with Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., and yet he says the most common question his wife gets is, "Your husband is lieutenant governor? What does he do?"

Quite a lot, it turns out.

And yet, Herbert no doubt hopes most of you will continue to wonder what he does as this coming Tuesday turns into Wednesday. The only way his name would become a household word is if something went terribly wrong with the balloting.

By law, the lieutenant governor is in charge of all elections in Utah. That means that, as in most other states, Utah leaves the integrity of its elections in the hands of an elected official.

It's a built-in conflict of interest as wide as Bryce Canyon, but it is one that is repeated on the county level as well, where partisan elected county clerks run the nuts and bolts of voting.

Story continues below
And the fact you're probably not too worried about that is a tribute to this political process. Elected officials are kept in check by their accountability to voters, and by the difficulty of hiding things in an information age.

From the beginning of the republic, few urges have been stronger than the one to rig the political process. At times, from the late 19th century to the mid 20th, elections in parts of this country would have had a hard time getting past the glare of a U.N. observer team. Predominantly black precincts in the South somehow elected white segregationists, and in parts of Texas, dead people rose up and voted in alphabetical order in the 1948 Senate race.

But there are two reasons why it's harder than ever to bring it about. One is the instant spread of information. It's hard to stuff ballot boxes when someone nearby could flip a cell phone and land an image on CNN almost instantly. The other is technology. Modern equipment is harder to compromise than simply stuffing a box.

Harder, that is, but not impossible.

Herbert is a man of ironies, in one sense. As he has told me on several occasions, he was not a fan of expensive new voting equipment. The old punch-card ballots served democracy well and provided a way to reliably check results, the infamous problems in Florida in 2000 not withstanding.

Recent comments

HackSauce-

Are you admitting to committing a felony by "hacking"...

Truth | Nov. 10, 2007 at 10:41 a.m.

Many of us nerds know how to hack into voting machines and manipulate...

HackSauce | Nov. 8, 2007 at 10:26 a.m.

I think that Mr.evensteven (of the previous post) is justified in his...

InMyExperience | Nov. 4, 2007 at 7:00 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

This is great news. Utah is a back water of conservative zombies marching...

"I'm better at spending your money than you are" - barack

All-MWC football awards

Congrats to the Cougars and Utes players. I think Terence Brown should have...

Who is paying for the treatment of all these people? Do they all have...

Not all U fans are bad, but the 5% that choose to: - Shout inflamitory words...

Son, you don't get it. Your elysian dreams of socialist utopia are over....

Ah, the Holy Grail of biofuels. Making it out the leftovers that nobody...

Why should insurance companies be viewed as healthcare providers? They should...

Letters: Conservatives confused

Here here....Agreed! In the early years, The Mormons were the Liberals....

To "Pagan | 8:11 a.m." how can the government do a better job than private...

Advertisements