Despite what rules say, conflict of interest clear

Published: Friday, Oct. 19, 2007 12:24 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
This past week, Utahns got a clear look at what is increasingly becoming a sensitive issue in the state Legislature: conflicts of interest among the 104 part-time lawmakers.

This newspaper broke the story locally of two lawmakers who have clear dealings with an attempt to build a nuclear-powered electrical generation plant in Utah.

Yet both men did not publicly disclose those efforts, even though one co-chairs an interim study committee that is holding nuclear power hearings and the other sits on that committee.

And both men steadfastly maintain that they did not break any legislative conflict of interest rules.

The public brouhaha that has erupted in Capitol hallways is leaving both citizens and other legislators shaking their heads, all saying the same thing: If this is not a conflict of interest under legislative rules, then clearly legislative rules are ineffective on conflicts of interest.

While many may agree that conflict of interest rules may be ineffective — not only for Reps. Mike Noel, R-Kanab, and Aaron Tilton, R-Springville, but for every other legislator — don't hold your breath on any rule changes.

Story continues below

When confronted with clear conflicts of interests, legislators have a standard response: circle the wagons, deny there is a conflict, blame the media and move on.

Move on to more conflicts of interests, more distrust of lawmakers and the legislative process.

I'll let you decide if there are conflicts for Noel and Tilton.

Quick facts: Tilton, whose private job is consulting on energy producing projects, like coal-fired electrical plants, in February started a new firm, Transition Power Development LLC. Its goal is to get a new nuclear power plant licensed in Utah (location not yet decided). He and his partners (he names one, but refuses to say who is backing the project financially) would then sell that license to an entity that would actually build the $3 billion plant. Tilton didn't amend his written conflict of interest form listing TPD until last week.

Noel is an environmental consultant and director of the Kane County Water Conservancy District.

Tilton's TPD recently signed an agreement with the water district, making a $10,000 down payment, to buy up to 30,000 acre feet of water each year for the nuclear plant. It is planned that TPD will pay the district $100,000 a year for five years, then $500,000 a year until the plant comes online, and then $1 million a year after that for water.

Noel says he has no conflict of interest because he gets a set salary from the district, and even if it gets $1 million annual payments from Tilton's group, he won't make any more money. Thus, he doesn't have a financial interest in the nuclear power plant, and thus no conflict under legislative rules.

Recent comments

This is clearly a conflict of interest, I do not know the process or...

sosueme534 | Oct. 23, 2007 at 6:11 a.m.

Thanks Bob.

A free, unfettered press with good, honest reporters...

Joe Watts | Oct. 21, 2007 at 8:30 a.m.

We have the same situation brewing in Sevier County. There, a 270Mw...

Michael | Oct. 20, 2007 at 7:52 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

wow! i cant believe this! he was a great man and no one expected this. he...

Just another example of the skewed world of professional sports...true...

LDS seminary principal is arrested in sexual abuse

wow!! he lied to so many!!!!!!

I forgot what I was going to say. Let's go ride bikes!

I have had it up to here......next time I am voting for Prop Hate!

Everyone here blames the victim over the teacher in these cases...regardless...

"friend says..." dang typos.

LDS institutions will not crack down more on this issue...they tend to...

In economic bad times if your neighbor is out of a job, it's a recession. If...

Nice Turns, Tatiana! Nice behind too ;)

Advertisements