From Deseret News archives:

Despite what rules say, conflict of interest clear

Published: Friday, Oct. 19, 2007 12:24 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
This past week, Utahns got a clear look at what is increasingly becoming a sensitive issue in the state Legislature: conflicts of interest among the 104 part-time lawmakers.

This newspaper broke the story locally of two lawmakers who have clear dealings with an attempt to build a nuclear-powered electrical generation plant in Utah.

Yet both men did not publicly disclose those efforts, even though one co-chairs an interim study committee that is holding nuclear power hearings and the other sits on that committee.

And both men steadfastly maintain that they did not break any legislative conflict of interest rules.

The public brouhaha that has erupted in Capitol hallways is leaving both citizens and other legislators shaking their heads, all saying the same thing: If this is not a conflict of interest under legislative rules, then clearly legislative rules are ineffective on conflicts of interest.

While many may agree that conflict of interest rules may be ineffective — not only for Reps. Mike Noel, R-Kanab, and Aaron Tilton, R-Springville, but for every other legislator — don't hold your breath on any rule changes.

When confronted with clear conflicts of interests, legislators have a standard response: circle the wagons, deny there is a conflict, blame the media and move on.

Story continues below
Move on to more conflicts of interests, more distrust of lawmakers and the legislative process.

I'll let you decide if there are conflicts for Noel and Tilton.

Quick facts: Tilton, whose private job is consulting on energy producing projects, like coal-fired electrical plants, in February started a new firm, Transition Power Development LLC. Its goal is to get a new nuclear power plant licensed in Utah (location not yet decided). He and his partners (he names one, but refuses to say who is backing the project financially) would then sell that license to an entity that would actually build the $3 billion plant. Tilton didn't amend his written conflict of interest form listing TPD until last week.

Noel is an environmental consultant and director of the Kane County Water Conservancy District.

Tilton's TPD recently signed an agreement with the water district, making a $10,000 down payment, to buy up to 30,000 acre feet of water each year for the nuclear plant. It is planned that TPD will pay the district $100,000 a year for five years, then $500,000 a year until the plant comes online, and then $1 million a year after that for water.

Recent comments

This is clearly a conflict of interest, I do not know the process or...

sosueme534 | Oct. 23, 2007 at 6:11 a.m.

Thanks Bob.

A free, unfettered press with good, honest reporters...

Joe Watts | Oct. 21, 2007 at 8:30 a.m.

We have the same situation brewing in Sevier County. There, a 270Mw...

Michael | Oct. 20, 2007 at 7:52 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Skateboarder stabbed at park

Whatever happened to curfews for kids? I'm not blaming the victim. But why do...

Obama, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, Barney the Frank, all....allllll.... all are...

TCU moves into 4th place in BCS

That is exactly what you zoobs were saying last year. Somehow, you think that...

Away in a manger

If you believe that God is the almighty then why worry about disbelievers? ...

@lesson one: I do not trust any politician of either party to tell the...

Becky Thomas: Find the cheese!

The article deals with the need to be flexible when crisis comes. The...

5A football: Darts edge PG

I just want to brag about something.....check out my prediction I posted on...

Jobless husbands help at home?

Though having the housework done is nice, it means much more to have my...

The only game that I have missed this year, due to my brother getting married...

What 3A team are we talking about? and what does that have to do with this year?

Advertisements
Advertisement