From Deseret News archives:

Developer cash flows into Eagle Mountain races

Are the industry's contributions tied to city's political woes?

Published: Monday, Oct. 15, 2007 12:34 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
EAGLE MOUNTAIN — There are two political truths in Eagle Mountain: No. 1: Money is the key to winning an election. No. 2: Developers are the key to getting money.

That's why every elected official from the city's past two elections — excluding the current, council-appointed mayor — accepted substantial amounts of campaign money from developers, construction companies and real estate groups. They wanted to win — and did.

But the ongoing tradition of getting big campaign bucks from the development industry may soon change as some residents are beginning to blame the city's history of political problems on a too-close connection with the industry. Some candidates are even refusing campaign contributions from developers as a part of their election platform.

Utah law doesn't limit from whom candidates can receive campaign money, but political analysts say candidates should be wary of accepting funds that may have invisible strings attached to them. Accepting a majority of funds from one source can also have an unwitting impact on elected officials, says Kirk Jowers, director of the Hinckley Institute of Politics.

Story continues below
In 2005, 57 percent of the winning officials' campaign funds came from the development industry. Two years earlier, city leaders received 56 percent of their campaign funds from the special interest group. In both elections, 31 percent and 45 percent, respectively, of the overall amount of the developers' winning contributions came from one developer, John Walden.

"It certainly makes an impact on the elected officials, regardless of whether there's any bad intent," Jowers said. "The vast majority of campaign contributions have nothing to do with untoward motives. The problem comes when there are so few contributors and a contribution can have such a huge impact on a candidate's election. There probably is nothing stated, nothing promised, but simple human nature will certainly make you more sympathetic to someone who has provided one-third to one-half of your war chest."

All of the city's current council accepted donations from developers at some point during their campaigns because the city has a limited commercial base. In 2005, about 52 percent of Councilwoman Heather Jackson's campaign money came from construction companies and entities interested in development. Jackson is running for mayor.

Recent comments

That does not mean slap in as many high density poor quality projects...

Anonymous | Nov. 2, 2007 at 4:41 p.m.

Most of you make absolutey no sense. The first step in building a...

Michael | Oct. 22, 2007 at 12:10 p.m.

Mark it's the home buyers money you use to pay the impact fees for...

Sick of EM | Oct. 17, 2007 at 11:26 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Residents protest Elk Ridge ordinance

I could not believe the mentality of some of the residents that attended the...

Budget hinges on economic growth

Governor Herbert is doing what he is paid to do -- manage well as tightly as...

Just go back to being royal blue and give up the navy blue. Be true to...

My best to Tiger. This will not be easy to fix and more importantly it will...

Barack Obama plunged us into a recession? How is that possible considering we...

It is a great blessing to live so close and have this opportunity. Still, it...

hehe. Unintentional humor at its best.

LDS to emphasize helping needy

The only ones who think they are Christians are Mormons(FLDS,LDS) a good...

Wall Street regulatory overhaul

Let's not forget that the economy tanked well before Obama was in office.

Editorial: Another BCS mess

For the teams in the big six conferences every week is a playoff, and that is...

Advertisements