Fix NCLB or junk it

Published: Friday, Oct. 12, 2007 12:14 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The federal No Child Left Behind Act is a key component of President Bush's domestic agenda. As such, he is pulling out all the stops as the 5-year-old law comes up for renewal. Congress should either salvage the workable parts of NCLB or junk it.

By now it should be painfully obvious that cookie-cutter education reform doesn't work. It makes little sense to hold schools in tiny rural and remote communities to the same standards as inner-city schools in the nation's largest cities. As a measure of accountability, what is achieved by labeling a school as a failure when it missed the mark on one of 40 benchmarks?

What does accountability mean, anyway, when some school districts avail themselves to appeals processes and others do not, presumably because they don't know how to play the game?

At the same time, it is true that NCLB has pressured many schools that have had long histories of poor academic achievement to perform better and to do more to meet the needs of students. While many education leaders decry the heavy hand of NCLB, are they willing to impose accountability measures that reward the very best educators and the most improved academic performances yet impose penalties when schools under-perform? Will they address teachers who are ineffective?

Story continues below

That's the $64,000 question regarding school reform. Would the states, in lieu of federal oversight, be willing to take on teacher unions in imposing accountability measures that are meaningful and have teeth?

If not, perhaps NCLB or a law like it serves a purpose. If Congress elects to keep it, it needs to take a realistic look at the vast differences in the nation's public school systems. Can a single accountability measurement take into account differences in school funding, school readiness or location? Should Piute High School, a small, rural school, be assessed in the same manner as an inner-city school in Detroit? Isn't measuring student progress over time a more logical benchmark than snapshots derived from high-stakes tests?

As much as this page has struggled with the notion of federal oversight of public schools — and in many respects, continues to do so — the bottom line is this: How would the states fill the accountability vacuum if NCLB was to sunset? Until a workable substitute is developed, there may be some rationale for reauthorizing NCLB.

Recent comments

Accountability: Nice analogy! You illustrate why we have to be...

Joe Moe | Oct. 12, 2007 at 1:33 p.m.

Picture this. A man goes into a doctor for a condition. The doctor...

Accountability | Oct. 12, 2007 at 12:19 p.m.

I think I am with you Joe. The system needs to address ALL of the...

j | Oct. 12, 2007 at 11:41 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

I forgot what I was going to say. Let's go ride bikes!

He was murdered by his mistress, not by terrorists while he was trying to...

anon | 1:42 p.m. July 11, 2009 you said: " I really wish the media weren't...

I think the cheaper option is to trade Maynor and go with Kruger. I thought...

Jazz brass debate Millsap match

But I am very disappointed in the way this is being handled. For his...

BYU is clearly the better team of the two, they have proven that for the past...

Private property is private property. If you don't follow the wishes of the...

Jazz brass debate Millsap match

Looks like Portland is in the process of putting one over on the Jazz! We...

Whoa! This is another insane idea from this administration.

Big deal. 17 goals in 81 games is crap. He won't play in Europe so the...

Advertisements