Utah gets a bang for its federal tax buck

Published: Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2007 12:34 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — The federal government's system of taxing and spending works out well for people in states like New Mexico, Mississippi and West Virginia — and Utah.

Not so well for those in Delaware, Minnesota and New Jersey.

New Mexico received $3.10 in federal spending for every tax dollar the state sent to Washington in 2005 — more than any other state — according to an Associated Press analysis of new federal data.

Delaware fared the worst, receiving just 42 cents for every tax dollar sent to Washington. It was followed closely by Minnesota, which got 46 cents, and New Jersey, 57 cents.

Utah was on the plus side: The state received $1.27 in federal spending for every tax dollar sent to Washington. For every $4,677 in federal taxes per Utahn that were sent to Washington, the state received $5,952 per person in federal spending.

In all, 30 states and the District of Columbia received more money from the federal government than they paid in federal taxes.

No wonder there's a federal budget deficit.

"I don't get all worked up that Minnesota only gets 46 cents back. I get worked up about the lack of accountability," said Lynn Reed, executive director of the Minnesota Taxpayers Association, which advocates for a more transparent tax system.

Story continues below

"You could write into law that every state should get at least 80 cents back, but that's dumb," he said. "It's inefficient."

The Census Bureau released its annual report on 2005 spending by the federal government Tuesday. It documents the geographic distribution of $2.3 trillion in government spending, including salaries, grants, military pay, government contracts and Social Security payments. It excludes interest on the national debt, overseas spending and the classified budgets of intelligence agencies.

The AP compared the census data to previously released IRS figures for 2005 federal tax collections. The IRS data includes individual, corporate and excise taxes.

The analysis shows that wealthy states pay more than poor ones, blue states subsidize red states, and states with powerful politicians on key House and Senate committees fare well in federal spending.

High-income states like New Jersey, Connecticut and Massachusetts paid more in taxes than they received in federal spending, while low-income states like Mississippi, West Virginia and Alabama got a much higher return for their tax dollars.

The exceptions were Alaska, Hawaii, Virginia and Maryland — high-income states that also received high levels of government spending.

Scott Hodge, president of the Tax Foundation, a Washington research group, said the numbers represent a massive redistribution of the nation's wealth.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Blazers get the unbalanced trade they seek while not signing Millsap away...

Ricky Bobby - THE JAZZ DO NOT WANT TO TAKE BACK EQUAL SALARIES. They want to...

Owls need holes for nest

Despite the fact that logging has all but stopped in the pacific northwest...

My understanding of what FAIR is trying to do, is to provide well thought out...

Jazz will resign Milsap. If they don't it will be ahuge mistake. First off,...

Stadium of Fire flag burning was fake

I was waiting for it to be burned on the big metal structure right by the...

Hey Ute fan... the Utes had a good season. And keep throwing that BCS bowl...

Tyrus Thomas is in the last year of his contract too so what is the point for...

CougarKeith, people don't know how to properly retire the flag, what they did...

It is just talk but since it was brought up: IF we can get Prizbilla &...

Advertisements