From Deseret News archives:

Uintah County duo denied a new trial in obstruction

Published: Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2007 12:23 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A Roosevelt businessman and the former head of the Uintah County Special Service District have been denied in their bid for a new trial.

Following a three-hour hearing Friday in U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City, Judge Ted Stewart ruled that attorneys for Gil Mitchell and Katherine "Kate" Erickson failed to prove that a guilty verdict against their clients should be overturned.

The two each stand convicted of three federal felony counts for obstruction of justice. The convictions stem from efforts by Mitchell, owner of Ned B. Mitchell Construction, and Erickson, who was responsible for overseeing road improvement projects for Uintah County, to falsify documents subpoenaed by a grand jury in January 2000.

According to Melodie Rydalch, public information officer for the U.S.. Attorney General's Office, sentencing for the pair will take place in January. Each count carries a possible maximum penalty of up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Legal counsel for Mitchell and Erickson had challenged the guilty verdicts on the grounds that prosecutors failed to submit sufficient evidence to prove guilt, and also prejudiced jurors against their clients.

Story continues below
Defense attorneys Wendy Lewis and Loren E. Weiss sought either an acquittal or a new trial on the grounds that the government presented "little or no evidence" that their clients acted dishonestly. They also maintained the jury was unduly biased by the evidence and arguments raised by the government during testimony, as well as in their opening and closing statements.

During the five-day trial in January, a Uintah Special Service District board member testified that the board implicitly trusted Erickson and did not review paperwork she presented for payment when they signed checks made out to Mitchell Construction. An employee of the district testified that she was present when Mitchell and Erickson changed dates on paperwork to be submitted to the grand jury.

An investigation into improprieties determined that two of the contracts Mitchell was being paid for had actually been terminated in 1998 and the third had been awarded to another company.

The three contracts for the road projects that prosecutors maintained had been altered were submitted to the grand jury in the course of their investigation into allegations of bid-rigging and kickbacks on federally funded road projects handled by the Uintah Special Service District in the late 1990s.

Erickson was fired as the district's manager in May 2001 after a list of improprieties came to light, including between $200,000 and $400,000 paid to Mitchell Construction for work that was allegedly never performed or for which he was overpaid.

Uintah County did not take legal action against the pair, choosing the let federal investigators file criminal complaints.


E-mail: lezleewhiting@hotmail.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

What a bunch of garbage on these boards. Can't beleive I wasted my time...

Child porn is today's witch hunt. 80% of computers contain unwanted spyware...

Tavernari has matured

He used to wait a half second before launching; Now, it's more like one...

to Fredd, I really hope the Smithsonian doesn't read your post.

New U. telescope captures universe

There is now the ability to compensate for atmospheric based disturbances in...

Fort Hood suspect charged

Oh GOOD! Now at least the left can quit whining that he hasn't been charged...

Celtics crush Jazz

if you read the article in the Boston Globe about last nights game. what...

Yeah, right. Another one of those famous "slipped through the crack" events...

This must not be very important or BYU would have done this already.

Mormons entering maintstream

You had to move out of Utah to realize that truth? It looks like you need to...

Advertisements
Advertisement