From Deseret News archives:

Vouchers or not, families will be fine

Published: Friday, Sept. 28, 2007 12:31 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
If you've seen recent TV ads for and against private school vouchers, you're probably wondering how both sides claim to help Utah families, when both sides say the other side will hurt Utah families.

Utah families seem to be in real trouble, if you believe the TV ads.

Actually, most Utah families are doing just fine. And they will continue to do just fine, with or without vouchers.

The pro-voucher side, mainly through Parents for Choice in Education, its PAC and PIC, so far has the hardest-hitting ads, especially the one with Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy, and San Francisco's U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (in the radio ad version) and MoveOn.org.

A second pro-voucher TV ad talks about the "liberal" National Education Association.

Both ads say don't let these "liberal" people or institutions take away choice from Utah families.

Of course, Kennedy, Pelosi and MoveOn.org have nothing to do with the Utah voucher act, passed by the 2007 Legislature.

Story continues below
They might as well say Osama bin Laden wants to take away parental choice (actually, he might, but he's not on the Utah ballot, either). And while Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. says he won't be a "poster boy" for either side, he's become one for pro-vouchers, since PCE uses the governor's picture in its TV ads. Huntsman did sign the bill but says he wants to stay out of this fight.

The NEA actually does have something to do with the November election, because it is funneling millions of dollars into the anti-voucher campaign.

But at least we know that the NEA is doing this, and we have a pretty good idea where its PAC money is coming from — public school teachers across the nation who pay PAC dues into the national education group through their local teacher union chapters.

We don't know where all of the money that Parents for Choice in Education is coming from. As reported in last Sunday's Deseret Morning News, the PCE's own PIC and PAC get some funds from the same group's corporation and nonprofit foundation.

We do know, from years gone by, that PCE has gotten a lot of out-of-state money (just like the Utah Education Association has gotten a lot of out-of-state money from the NEA) from individuals and groups that back private-school vouchers.

Meanwhile, the anti-voucher side's hands are not very clean, either.

Recent comments

Vouchers Equal Segregation

The base of Ultra Mormons don't want...

Jackopus | Oct. 15, 2007 at 11:47 a.m.

James, if you believe that supporting public schools is an extreme...

Craig | Sept. 29, 2007 at 7:06 a.m.

Oh and Craig, there are concepts at play here. The whole issue of...

James | Sept. 29, 2007 at 12:39 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Religion cited in deportation fight

This family lacks clout. America's First Auntie, Zeituni Onyango, has a new...

Actually, in the IVF case - her insurance would only pay for fertility...

Don't get in a mud slinging contest with a pig.

As a parent, I would want my son to attend the school that would help him get...

"{It assesses a 10-percent tax on admission fees and user fees charged by...

Nephi's steel bow difficult to replicate

Incredulous said: "Be careful, or you'll find actual scientific evidence...

Since he probably doesn't know what Ed L is talking about - it was Hurricane...

Boozer looking like 'the old Booz'

1. two undersize power forward can and do work. if there is a CENTER neither...

Can BYU throw vs. Air Force?

The real quuestion is not whether BYU can throw but can BYU run the ball...

4A: Timpview wins 4th in 4 years

want to know what would make your comment good? If it had anything to do with...

Advertisements