From Deseret News archives:

Off-roading may be restricted near Moab

Published: Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2007 12:02 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A new Bureau of Land Management proposal would sharply limit off-highway vehicle travel through the 1.8 million acres the agency controls in the vicinity of Moab.

The proposal is among actions the BLM supports in a new draft resource management plan and environmental impact statement for the Moab Field Office region. The area includes 1.5 million acres in Grand County and 300,000 acres in San Juan County.

The document, which will be available for public comment for 90 days, is expected to be finalized and to go into effect in December.

Substantial changes could be made by then, said Shelly Smith, acting field manager of the BLM Moab Field Office.

The plan would replace one that was issued in 1985, which underwent some amendments. The new draft focuses on four alternatives: (A) no changes from present management; (B) oriented more toward protection of wilderness values and nonmotorized recreation; (C) the BLM's preferred plan; and (D) oriented more toward oil and gas development, and vehicle-based recreation.

Alternative C attempts to strike a balance, Smith said.

"Now, it doesn't mean that everyone can do everything, everywhere," she added during a meeting Monday with Deseret Morning News editors and writers.

Story continues below
The region has become a magnet for recreationists, she said. BLM land there drew 2 million visitors in 2006, around the same number as visited the world-famous Arches National Park near Moab.

Important changes are proposed in vehicle management. Present rules allow off-highway vehicle travel across 620,212 acres. On nearly 1.2 million acres, OHV travel is limited to existing roads and trails, while 5,062 acres are closed to OHV travel.

Under the conservation-oriented option B, 437,424 acres would be closed to OHV travel, about 1.475 million acres would limit ORVs to designated routes and cross-country travel would be banned throughout the region.

The BLM's preferred option, alternative C, would close 339,298 acres to OHV travel, limit OHV use to designated routes on almost 1.5 million acres and open 1,866 acres to cross-country travel at White Wash Sand Dunes.

Alternative D, which favors oil and gas production and motorized recreation, would close 57,351 acres to OHV travel, allow OHVs on nearly 1.8 million acres of designated or inventoried routes, and open 3,064 acres at White Wash Sand Dunes and the Airport Hills to cross-country travel.

Recent comments

We have been visiting Moab once or twice a year for over twenty...

Mike & Margaret Brady | Sept. 18, 2007 at 8:47 p.m.

Off-roading near Moab may be cut back "sharply" but not nearly...

blkheli | Sept. 18, 2007 at 9:56 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Salaries questionable

The person making sure there is enough cash in the bank to cover your...

Look I can't afford health care either and it doesn't help to be forced to...

House passes health care bill

THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!! THE SKY IS FALLING!!!

To bad Brighton isnt still in it they beat 3 of the 4 teams that are still in...

Stick a fork in the Jazz! Why even bother to pay to go see these guys "play"....

re: One More Week. 15 minutes? Try two years. You do realize they have won...

McKay is A-OK in his return

I am sure McKay is tired of the constant comparisons. It has to be tough for...

another great game in this rivalry that has really become the best in the...

"Somehow, we are missing the boat when it comes to taking seriously the...

its funny to see how people say they knew it or whatever.. we knew san juan...

Advertisements
Advertisement