Airport fee protested: Utah facilities and farm industry call levy unfair

Published: Friday, Sept. 14, 2007 12:15 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Some of Utah's small airports and the state's agriculture industry are speaking out against a proposed new user fee at airports and a 125 percent increase in the federal turbine fuel tax.

During a telephone conference call Thursday morning organized by the Alliance for Aviation Across America, many reservations were expressed about the Aviation Investment and Modernization Act (S-1300).

The proposal would require a new $25 per-flight user fee to all general aviation. The fuel tax for turbine operators would also rise from 21 cents a gallon to 49 cents.

The current airport tax structure expires Sept. 30 and Congress is expected to address the proposed plan for airports next week.

"Our airport is vital to our economic well being," Stephen C. Thompson, a Logan City Councilman, said of the Logan Airport.

He believes the proposed new airport taxes will seriously impact businesses in the Cache Valley, since they rely on it.

Furthermore, Thompson said, Utah State University has a top-rated flight school and that too would suffer.

"This fuel tax would create a tremendous hardship on students," he said.

Story continues below

St. George also has concerns with the possible effects on its airport.

Mayor Daniel D. McArthur said this tax will hurt business at the airport, as well as the small businesses that use it. St. George is also hoping to build a new airport.

Even Utah agriculture would be affected by the proposed new airport fees.

For example, crop dusting is a vital component to successful Utah farms. Arthur Douglas, president of the Utah Farmers Union, said if crop dusters have to pay extra taxes, it will hurt the farm industry at a very vulnerable time, when it won't be able to pass such extra fees onto others — it will have to absorb them at a loss.

"It's an unnecessary tax," he said.

Former Utah Sen. Jake Garn also believes the proposed airport taxes would be unfair.

Speaking on the conference call, he said that while America's gasoline taxes fairly spread the burden among all users of the highways, these proposed airport taxes don't spread out the burden and will hurt small plane operators.

The Provo Municipal Airport could not be reached for comment on the fee proposals.

The members of the Alliance for Aviation Across America strongly support modernization of America's aviation system. However, the group believes the fees have the potential to negatively impact small and midsize businesses across the country.

The alliance believes the per-flight user fee is very regressive, applying equally to a jumbo jetliner flying out of JFK with 300 people aboard and a turboprop aircraft flying in controlled airspace from a small town with only five people aboard.

Recent comments

I was misquoted. I was talking about a proposed Utah HB 414 that has...

Ed Rich | Sept. 17, 2007 at 10:05 a.m.

Image
Jason Olson, Deseret Morning News

Airports may see new user fee and 125 percent hike in turbine fuel tax

previousnext

Latest comments

Good for Milsap, but whatever he does, he's got to get rid of this Ara...

Jazz brass debate Millsap match

no one griped last year when millie was getting paid 700.000. jazz could have...

I have always thought we invaded Iraq out of boredom; the 50 united states...

To the 3:37 commentator, Actually the 12:07 commentator was doing a lot...

Hey Kent- First of all, the Stadium of Fire is NOT a BYU production. ...

Leave him where he is and make him work or pay to stay there.

And let's put the blame where it all belongs....on Hedo. If he hadn't...

Just when you think Utah could not possibly get any more ridiculous,...

To the 10:51 commentator, Did I say he should not be on the sex offender...

To CJ3: How many centers out there really are their teams toughest post...

Advertisements