No Child's inherent problem

Published: Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2007 12:37 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The federal No Child Left Behind law always has stood as a contradiction. The Republican Party long has touted a decentralization of power away from Washington and the principle that education should be a local matter. And yet, a Republican Congress and president imposed this law, which gives Washington enormous power over local school districts and sets up a cookie-cutter template that applies to all schools, regardless of local circumstances.

However, the law also presents a conundrum difficult to ignore. Without this pressure from Washington, it is highly unlikely Utah schools would be taking the need for improvements seriously. The law exposed large inequities in Utah between the achievements of white and minority students. It also imposes real penalties for a school's failure to meet certain standards, which is something Utah lawmakers and school officials consistently have avoided doing.

Congress has begun debating again over how to change this law. Utah's delegation has its own unique ideas, ranging from Rep. Jim Matheson's detailed plan to loosen the requirements to Rep. Rob Bishop's desire to scrap the law altogether.

Given the new Democratic majority in Congress, the law isn't likely to be scrapped. A centralized approach to education seems here to stay. That's a shame.

Story continues below

Matheson's bill addresses a lot of real problems with the No Child Left Behind law. Its requirements for all teachers to be "highly qualified" in the subject they teach puts small rural schools at a disadvantage, even as it discounts experience teachers may have in lieu of college training. The law also is too unforgiving toward schools that deal with large populations of disabled or non-English speaking kids.

At least, No Child Left Behind acknowledges that public education in the United States must improve dramatically in order to compete with the education systems in other nations. It recognizes that improvements aren't likely to come without the threat of sanctions.

Unfortunately, to drive that point home it also usurps the powers of local school boards and the Legislature — two bodies that are much closer to the people of Utah than are the folks in Washington. Centralized solutions to local problems generally don't work. Contradictions and conundrums notwithstanding, that is the overwhelming problem with this law.

Recent comments

NCLB is a symptom of, and a part of, the problem. It is not the...

Tad Wimmer | Sept. 13, 2007 at 10:32 a.m.

Think about it! Has ANYTHING Mr. Bush pushed or touched been...

Bart Mortensen | Sept. 12, 2007 at 8:34 p.m.

No Child Left Behind = No Child Gets Ahead

And that's at the heart...

Anonymous | Sept. 12, 2007 at 7:28 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

I hope these kids can use the good they have gotten from this man and the...

Question: Would the church arrest a father and son showing affection in the...

Hey Ms. Seed, show your "love" for others by calling it off and respecting...

Actually, my car's on its last legs, and I was about to trash it and buy a...

Are you trying to tell me the Jazz don"t have it??? That is just crazy!!!...

I hope people only to talk with the family about his WHEN AND IF the family...

This is so dumb!

To the visitors to Utah who have said that they had tickets and now have...

2 men cited in trespassing on LDS plaza

emanating from a great majority of these comments. Always trying to twist...

Advertisements