From Deseret News archives:

Facing dilemma over meth houses

Published: Monday, Aug. 13, 2007 12:06 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Salt Lake Valley Health Department is caught in a dilemma. The department has been on the cutting edge of drug lab identification and decontamination for more than a decade. Now it is under fire for following state law — for not going far enough. And, as with many hot-button public health issues, pertinent facts are missing from what has become a very public debate over decontamination of meth houses in Salt Lake County.

In the early 1990s, the Salt Lake Valley Health Department quickly recognized the threat to public health from illegal drug labs. The department was one of the leaders in addressing illegal drug labs, and the Salt Lake Valley Health Department has been ahead of the curve in drug-lab issues. In fact, nearly 15 years ago, the health department requested that local law enforcement agencies in Salt Lake County report properties that were likely contaminated by illegal drug manufacturing. Such reports quickly became commonplace after publicity surrounding a pre-toddler diagnosed with contact chemical dermatitis — allegedly the result of crawling on carpet in a house used as a drug lab. At that time there were no recognized cleanup standards and no consistent statewide decontamination procedures.

For three consecutive legislative sessions, the health department lobbied the state Legislature for legislation to address contamination issues. Those efforts were unsuccessful, so in 2001 the Salt Lake Valley Board of Health adopted local regulations providing for the decontamination of drug-lab properties.

Story continues below
This local regulation provided for isolating contaminated sites, required submission of a work plan to the health department prior to decontamination work and adopted a standard for allowable levels of meth residue. That standard was not health-based, because no given level of exposure was (or currently is) known to be safe. The adopted standard was based on meth detection and on a cleanup level that could reasonably be achieved.

Three years ago, the Utah Legislature addressed the issue. That 2004 legislation requires (1) that law enforcement notify the local health department of known drug labs; (2) that the health departments place the contamination property on a list available for public review; and (3) that the property be removed from the list after the decontamination specialist submitted lab results showing the property's drug residue levels were below the decontamination standard.

Recent comments

"Methamphetamine is now being produced elsewhere," Yes it is produced...

Any Mouse | Aug. 13, 2007 at 10:58 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

When Boozer was shooting the free throws, why Sloan didn't substitute Mathew...

Letters: Global warming a lie

actions, I will be forced to be accountable for them. I refuse. I am an...

What's with the Utah fans flashing the double L sign?

@mark: So Sam da Ham... you were just making it up?" I'm a climate...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

"I have no idea why BYU fans are talking smack about bowl opponents. Even if...

TCU versus BSU unpopular

You say to "quit whining and play somebody." Isn't that what everyone is...

BoM translation remarkably consistent

Reading these comments, I start wondering-- Whatever happened to faith? Why...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

All those numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...

BYU eager for crack at Oregon State

All thos numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...

So Sam da Ham, when you said this: "Not so. Al Gore is poised to make...

Advertisements