Forget the 4th seat plan

Published: Thursday, July 26, 2007 12:08 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Each time the bill that would give Utah a fourth House seat hits a snag, the clock ticks closer to the 2010 Census. And, even though reports this week indicate the Senate may now have the votes to pass the bill and avoid a filibuster, the snags ahead make one thing abundantly clear: Utah has no compelling need to continue supporting the effort.

Supporters of voting rights for residents of the District of Columbia say the nation can't call itself a true democracy when the people who live in the capital city have no representation in Congress.

This is a legitimate concern, but the bill in question is not a legitimate way to address it.

The bill is a grand compromise. It would expand the House by two members, giving one new representative to Utah and one to the District of Columbia. It is a compromise because the Utah seat surely would go to a Republican, and the District's seat would go to a Democrat.

But for people who believe the Constitution means what it says, the bill is a disaster. The Constitution says House members shall be "chosen every second year by the people of the several states ..." Inconvenient as it may be, the District of Columbia is not a state. Its residents are indeed worthy of representation, but the Constitution would have to be amended first. That's what happened in 1961 when the nation wanted to allow Washington three votes in the electoral college. The 23rd Amendment had to be passed to allow it.

Story continues below

The Senate is advancing quickly toward its summer recess. If the bill isn't considered by then, that would be another snag that takes time. If it is considered and passed, it would have to be reconciled with a House version and passed again by both chambers. More snags and more time.

Finally, the bill would have to survive a possible presidential veto, only to face the real chance of a legal challenge. Several months ago, a group of Republicans in Utah reportedly was readying legal briefs for just such a challenge.

Add it all up and Utah is far better off simply waiting for the next Census, which is sure to grant the fast-growing state at least a fourth, and possibly a fifth, representative.

Once that happens, advocates in the District of Columbia will have lost a giant lever in their fight for voting rights. That may be a shame, but this is an issue that needs to be addressed in the proper way — on its merits.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Thanks for the report. We need more of these as more and more youth are...

Recently in an English class at a family center where the parents and...

'Love advocates' plan 'kiss-in' at Main Street Plaza

It was the Mormons who threw the first stone in this scuffle with their...

Obama: 'Africa not separate from world affairs'

1. Offended the Queen of England . 2. Bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia ....

Please, offended Mormons, enlighten an out-of-state observer- I have seen...

He was put in a Position Of Trust. He violated that Trust apparently many...

This demonstration is calculated to disrupt and/or offend the sensibilities...

Let's control borders

David: How would an 'illegal' even get on welfare? Please inform us how that...

I agree that we should be careful about judging too quickly, but I do think...

Too bad Snoozer opted in. It's a shame that the Jazz couldn't have taken his...

Advertisements