From Deseret News archives:

School board changes in air?

Published: Thursday, July 19, 2007 12:19 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Proposed changes to election laws could tighten requirements for state school board candidates.

Under the proposal presented Wednesday to the Government Operations Interim Committee, candidates for the state school board would be required to live in their district for a year before the election date. Currently, they are not required to reside in their district until they are elected.

The new residency requirements are more stringent than those for legislators, who need to live in their district for six months before the last day for filing for office. The proposed requirements are, however, on par with those of most local school districts.

Sen. Greg Bell, R-Farmington, suggested that the state school board have the same requirements as legislators, since they are state offices and more comparable to other state offices than local boards.

"It is to have parity between the (state school) board and the Senate and the House," he said. "I don't know why it should be different."

The committee did not vote on the proposal. Instead, members requested an outline of the residency requirements for every state and local office so they could try to make them as similar as possible.

Story continues below
Another change that was rebuffed by the committee would have reduced the amount of time given to groups trying to put an initiative on statewide ballots. The proposal by the state elections office would have required groups to submit a petition for signature verification 45 days earlier than they do now.

Currently, those deadlines are between June 1 and July 6, but the new rule would make the petitions due between April 15 and June 1. The change was requested by county clerks because primaries are also held in mid-June, and the workload can become too heavy for their staffs if they also have to verify signatures.

Committee members worried about further tightening an initiative law that is already considered one of the strictest in the nation. Also, they were concerned about backlash from the Utah Supreme Court, which has previously hinted that any further restrictions on initiatives would not be viewed kindly.

"I think we're talking a significant policy issue," said Rep. Ron Bigelow, R-West Valley. "I'm a little hesitant to even go on record of supporting" the drafting of a bill for changing the dates, let alone the rule change itself.

Instead, Bigelow suggested that if individual legislators are supportive of the change, they should sponsor the bill themselves. He did not think that the interim committee would be likely to support it.


E-mail: jloftin@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

watch out for next year for sure, the negatives are just closet (and...

And something else, I generally follow players from the state schools when...

I could care less that Max Hall said what he did. The feeling is mutual BYU...

BYU is champion of the state

Dear Max, probably could have done without that comment. Probably would've...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

As a Utah fan, let me first say congratulations to Max Hall, the Cougars, and...

Geno's and Pat's are good.. but, they are mostly for tourists, the real...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

(You even got a middle initial... how's that for 'ya Max) It's nice to see...

Air Up There, The

Even today, I still cannot get enough of this movie or Charles Gitonga Maina....

Cougars beat Utes in overtime

...disappointed with Max Hall's comments that he hates everything about UofU....

Over the last few days I read comments of people complaining about tasteless...

Advertisements