From Deseret News archives:

Custody laws put many in limbo

Published: Sunday, June 24, 2007 12:17 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
For same-sex couples, in particular the partners of biological parents, the law offers no protection.

Last February the Utah Supreme Court ruled in a case of a same-sex couple who had separated and the non-biological partner was fighting for visitation rights. The high court ruled in Jones vs. Barlow that a domestic partner did not have any right under Utah law to claim visitation rights.

In the case, a lesbian couple had agreed to have a child and raise it together. However, when the girl was 2 years old the couple separated, and the biological mother became a born-again evangelical Christian. The ex-partner petitioned a Utah judge for visitation. The judge granted the woman visitation and ordered her to pay child support under a common-law statute known as "in loco parentis," Latin for "in the place of a parent."

The judge ruled that because the two women had planned to raise the child together from birth and that the ex-partner was a parental figure, it was in the best interest of the child to have both women in her life.

The Utah Supreme Court struck down that ruling, finding that Utah law did not afford the ex-partner that right. The Legislature, according to the ruling, would have to craft a law to change that.

Story continues below
Just before the court ruled in Jones vs. Barlow, Gina Herrera of Draper was struggling with a similar situation. She and her domestic partner of 10 years had also decided to have a baby through artificial insemination. Late last year, Herrera and her partner, Hollii Whiting, decided to call off their relationship, and Whiting took her daughter.

The two women were working out a visitation agreement when the Utah Supreme Court ruled. The next day, Herrera said she was told by Whiting that the agreement would be yanked.

"We had seen each other the day of the ruling," Herrera said of the little girl. "I had a little bit of hope."

It has been almost six months since she has seen the girl Herrera considers her daughter.

"It angers me and it disgusts me. We shouldn't be treated differently than divorced heterosexual couples," Herrera said. "People need to realize that biology doesn't make a parent and that the child's best interest needs to be the priority."

Although the legal outlook for her fight looks bleak, Herrera said "giving up is not an option."

In a statement sent to the Deseret Morning News, Whiting's attorney, Bryant McConkie, said his client made the decision to cut off visitation with Herrera to keep her daughter from being placed in a confusing environment.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Gina Herrera of Draper displays a photograph of her daughter, Maddie, who is in the custody of Herrera's former domestic partner.

previousnext

Latest comments

watch out for next year for sure, the negatives are just closet (and...

And something else, I generally follow players from the state schools when...

I could care less that Max Hall said what he did. The feeling is mutual BYU...

BYU is champion of the state

Dear Max, probably could have done without that comment. Probably would've...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

As a Utah fan, let me first say congratulations to Max Hall, the Cougars, and...

Geno's and Pat's are good.. but, they are mostly for tourists, the real...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

(You even got a middle initial... how's that for 'ya Max) It's nice to see...

Air Up There, The

Even today, I still cannot get enough of this movie or Charles Gitonga Maina....

Cougars beat Utes in overtime

...disappointed with Max Hall's comments that he hates everything about UofU....

Over the last few days I read comments of people complaining about tasteless...

Advertisements