Municipalities seeking state funds to pay extra costs for voucher referendum

Utah Supreme Court says voters should decide yes or no

Published: Saturday, June 9, 2007 12:09 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Sure, there's been confusion over this November's ballot question on private school vouchers. But even though that was cleared up Friday by a Utah Supreme Court decision, another question remains.

Who's going to pay for the election?

Municipalities statewide have already budgeted funds to hold local elections on Nov. 6. The problem is, since it turned into a statewide election, the price tag is going to be more than 2 1/2 times higher.

So Lt. Gov. Gary Herbert, whose office oversees elections, is meeting with local leaders to figure out how much the state has to come up with to cover the additional costs of the election.

Right now, a "very, very, very rough estimate" is about $2.3 million, according to Herbert's chief of staff, Joe Demma. That number could change, he said. "There's a lot of people coming to the table right now."

That includes nearly $1.2 million that the state would distribute to counties to run the election. The rest would be needed by the lieutenant governor's office to pay for technical support for electronic voting machines and putting together a voter information pamphlet.

Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., who set the election date for the voucher referendum just last month, said he wouldn't have chosen Nov. 6 without assurances that local governments would be reimbursed for the unanticipated costs.

Story continues below

Legislative leaders said that they would come up with the money. Senate President John Valentine, R-Orem, said they're waiting for more details. "The discussion is ongoing," Valentine said.

One option that's being talked about is dipping into the $3.35 million already allocated for next year's presidential primary on Feb. 5. "That's a pretty easy solution," Valentine said.

Demma said pitches will be made later this month to both the Republican and Democratic legislative caucuses to make sure lawmakers are comfortable with that option — and that that money will be replenished in time to pay for the Feb. 5 presidential primary.

"We're all in kind of new territory here, figuring it out," said Brian Thompson, Utah County clerk and auditor. Thompson said it's only fair that the state make up the difference, since municipalities had no idea they needed to budget for a statewide election.

"It's really not fair for the cities," Thompson said. "They are the ones caught up in the middle of this."

Now costs will go up in cities like Morgan, where leaders budgeted just $2,000 for the November general election. City leaders budgeted so low because they planned to use paper ballots, said Lincoln Shurtz, legislative analyst for the Utah League of Cities and Towns.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Al Hartmann, Associated Press pool

Utah Lt. Gov. Gary Herbert listens to voucher arguments Friday at the Utah Supreme Court. He says he'll meet with local leaders to figure out how much the state has to come up with to cover the additional costs of the election.

previousnext

Latest comments

let Milsap go, I relize he may be one of 4 people on the team with heart, get...

To "I Smell California," who brilliantly made the following comment a few...

dollar contract and he is getting 10 million this year than he will only be...

The Jazz already have a couple of other PFs they can use: Okur is really a...

Wasn't Joseph Smith's "inspired translation" enough? Will someone please...

I had Bro Pratt as a seminary teacher only two years ago. He is the most...

We do need to see the evidence as it comes out in the Legal system. If...

Stop celebrity coverage

We want this stuff. The media aren't making money without our permission,...

I don't want homosexuals exposing themselves in front of my children. The...

Why bury GM story?

What some of you don't understand is that if GM had filed bankruptcy without...

Advertisements