From Deseret News archives:

'Mr. Twenty' bucks polls, petitioners

Published: Tuesday, June 5, 2007 12:15 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
For a man who won his re-election to the state Legislature by a mere 20 votes last fall, House Speaker Greg Curtis sure is sticking his neck out a lot these days.

When a political candidate wins by 20 votes, he's on thin ice with voters right from the start. When he's a Utah Republican who wins by 20 votes, it's a moral defeat. He doesn't exactly have a clear mandate from the people.

But you wouldn't know it to watch Curtis in action these past few weeks. There he was last week, speaking out in support of private school vouchers and blasting the governor's call for a special legislative session on the issue — public sentiment, referendums and governors be damned.

By the way, it was Curtis who helped spearhead legislation for public funding of a soccer stadium last March after the notion was clearly rejected by public opinion polls, two audits and the Salt Lake County mayor.

Just like that, in the space of three months, Mister Twenty Votes went squarely against public opinion on two controversial, emotional issues.

Now Curtis is once again moving heaven and earth on the voucher issue in an apparent attempt to make someone happy; the question is, who is moving him? If no one is, his ardent stance against referendums and anything that would stand in the way of vouchers makes no sense.

Story continues below
Both the stadium and voucher issues were so unpopular that they produced petitions for voter referendums. The voucher petition collected enough signatures to have a referendum placed on the ballot this fall. And that brings us to the present and to Curtis, the man who is credited with ramming the voucher legislation through the House in the first place. Two bills, to be precise.

Vouchers — the issue so big and complex it required two laws and input from a governor, the Utah Supreme Court and the attorney general. We haven't had this much fun since Dave Checketts came to town.

First, one voucher law (HB148) passed, by one vote in the House, though the Senate passed it more readily. When other anti-voucher legislators wanted to make some amendments to the law, Curtis and other GOP leaders feared it would be defeated, so he produced a second voucher law, HB174. It placated the public-ed people by throwing more money their way but meanwhile included enough voucher language to stand as a voucher law all by itself, according to the AG.

And here's the irony: The second voucher law passed by a two-thirds majority, which meant a referendum couldn't be used to repeal the law. So much for the anti-voucher legislators. You had to hand it to Curtis.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Beck, Hannity, and Limbaugh get the audience they deserve and vice versa. ...

I find the rule,very discriminitory. I am not gay, I don't understand what...

Celtics crush Jazz

I understand we were outmanned last night. However, this effort was awful....

Tavernari has matured

My advice to Jonathan is shoot it when they pass it to you as soon as you...

Maybe they should try drafting a shooting guard who can shoot from outside ....

The sad thing about it is that there are actually people out there that are...

12 Utes return to Texas

Thank you TCU and BYU. Your wanting to beat Utah so bad has to drive you...

Celtics crush Jazz

Play fes and koufos. Look to the future. It looks like we will have two...

Letters: Obama 'too busy'

Oh come on. Obama's a horrible president, but I couldn't care less which...

"We had the best soccer of any place in the state. There's no disputing...

Advertisements
Advertisement