From Deseret News archives:

Migrant bill may keep Utah kin apart

Published: Saturday, May 19, 2007 12:07 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Salvador Lazalde of Murray may have petitioned for his brother's immigration just in time.

Lazalde, a naturalized citizen from Mexico and director of Proyecto Paisano, filed a petition for his brother in 2001. Because of annual visa caps, Jose Luis Lazalde is now waiting in a long line. Legislation being considered by Congress would not negate the Lazalde petition but could create roadblocks for other families eager for reunification, said Salvador Lazalde.

"He's excited," Lazalde said. "All he has to do is wait his turn." His petition, at least, is already in process and would not fall victim to some of the provisions of legislation proposed this week, at least as currently written.

The comprehensive immigration plan, introduced Thursday in the U.S. Senate, could eliminate the family-relationship avenue for immigration altogether by removing some categories of family preferences, including siblings of citizens. Applications filed before May 1, 2005, would still be processed under the current law, giving the Lazaldes hope that they will still be reunited at some point.

On Monday, the Senate is expected to vote on whether to consider the bill, which requires 60 votes.

Story continues below
Much of the attention has focused on the "Z visa," which would put most of the nation's estimated 12 million illegal immigrants on a fast track to legal status.

Sister Kathleen Moroney, an immigration attorney for Holy Cross Ministries, said that while there are still many unclear issues about the 1,000-page bill, the Z visa is the minor part.

"The major focus that came out of this compromise between Republicans and Democrats is we will take visas away from families and give them to workers, and 'deserving workers,' because it's going to be done on a merit system," she said.

As written, the bill would be the biggest immigration overhaul since the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, replacing a national-origins quota system with a system based primarily on the reunification of families.

While citizens and permanent residents would still be able to sponsor a spouse and minor children, it would eliminate most other forms of family-reunification visas, including adult children and siblings. It would also place a cap of 50,000 parents of citizens each year, a category that currently has no cap.

Instead, the proposed measure would create a new merit system, in which those applying for permanent residency would be assigned points for skills, education and other attributes such as English proficiency or specialty in a high-demand field, according to a White House statement on the bill.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Antonella Packard and Rolando Murillo, members of the Latino community group ACELA, present Larry Shepherd, deputy state director for Sen. Bob Bennett's office, with signed petitions outside the Wallace F. Bennett Federal Building. The 6,850 signatures call for comprehensive immigration reform.

previousnext

Latest comments

If Hall never said anything would we be having this discussion. No. So some...

Ahmadinejad and Khamenei have nothing to worry about over these protests....

Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil

As long as violence, crime and vulgar language doesn't occur then let all the...

Letters: Global warming a lie

Kevin | 7:15 a.m. "Man-made Global Warming" IS... Religion to many of...

Senate to confront abortion in debate

AARP is backing the bill because it helps them not the seniors. AARP makes...

Utahn aiding poor

Louis has inspired the world to be a better place especially the empowerement...

"who was most likely are born that way, please cite these "studies" you have...

I knew mitchell many years ago before he embarked on this religious...

Re: and on and on they go | 11:25 a.m. Then why are you responding?

You had me until the last line. Then you lost credibility.

Advertisements