From Deseret News archives:

Should Utah also divest for Darfur?

Published: Sunday, May 13, 2007 12:37 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Last year, hoping to make some slight difference in the ongoing genocide in Darfur, the treasurer of Maine sold the state's holdings in Schlumberger, a French company that sells oil rigs to Sudan.

Treasurer David Lemoine's reasoning, supported by the Save Darfur Coalition and other activists, was that the Sudanese government is using oil revenue to fund attacks on civilians in Darfur.

If enough Americans refuse to invest in these companies, the argument goes, maybe the Sudanese government will do something to end the genocide there. Although divesting the state of Maine's small holdings in Schlumberger won't make any difference by itself, "You hope enough droplets of water can combine to create a torrent," says Lemoine.

Utah's State Retirement System also owns stock in Schlumberger. Utah, though, is not divesting its stocks.

Should Utahns be outraged at the state's lack of response to the national "Divest for Darfur" campaign? Would divestment be anything more than a political gesture? Once you start divesting to cure social ills, where do you stop? These are the questions facing government, university and corporate officials this spring as "Divest for Darfur" heats up its campaign nationwide.

Story continues below
The campaign is an attempt to pressure the Sudanese government by hitting it in the pocketbook, after diplomatic efforts have failed to stop the violence in the Darfur region of the country. There have been an estimated 200,000 civilian deaths (some say 400,000), plus the displacement of 2 million people since the killings, rapes and pillaging began in 2003.

Seven states so far have passed legislation mandating divestment of state funds in foreign companies that may be inadvertently supporting the regime in Khartoum, and 17 more states are considering similar legislation. Forty-two colleges and universities have divested.

The Sudan Divestment Task Force's campaign of "targeted divestment" has a list of companies it considers "highest offenders," companies that "have proven to be largely unengageable by shareholders or unwilling to consider altering problematic practices in Sudan." One of those companies is Schlumberger. The Utah State Retirement System owns some stock in Schlumberger, although it won't divulge how much.

Last fall, Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. received a letter from U.S. Sens. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., and Richard Durbin, D-Ill., urging him to help enact legislation requiring divestment of state-owned stocks.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Marcus Prior, Associated Press

Displaced Sudanese women line up to receive food at a camp near Kutum, Sudan, in 2004.

previousnext

Latest comments

Editorial: 10 years of TRAX

Sorry earlier I meant to say that tracks seems to travel at 35 miles an hour...

'Peter Frumhoff, the director of science and policy at the Union of...

The Non-BCS crowd ought to create their own title game...their own brand, and...

Letters: Democrats' ethics

That's the whole of your defense of GOP resistance to badly-needed ethics...

Your criticism should hardly be focused on Bennett alone. What about all the...

'Wired's Threat Level blog reported on November 20 that Gavin Schmidt, a...

The reality of climate change is supported by multiple lines of evidence and...

BYU professor remembered

I had the priviledge of staying in the LeBaron home on severl occasions as I...

Letters: Growing jobless rate

So the unemployment rate has dropped to "just" 10%, huh? I wonder what that...

Ahh for the love of money...what money can buy!!!

Advertisements