From Deseret News archives:

Are smaller school districts the answer?

Published: Sunday, May 6, 2007 12:10 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Webb: What's the size of the ideal school district? One of today's hottest education debates is over that question, along with the ensuing tax ramifications. Some east-side Salt Lake County communities want to split from Granite and Jordan, two of the state's largest school districts, and create smaller, compact districts.

Nothing wrong with small districts. Some of the best districts in the state are small. But size isn't the only issue. The big problem is that the breakaway communities could create a major tax fairness issue, pitting the stable, built-out east side against the booming west, where dozens of new schools must soon be built.

The westerners could be facing big property tax boosts to pay for needed new schools, while the east side has more schools than it needs.

The Legislature, which granted the breakaway authority, could solve the problem fairly easily by equalizing school capital outlay taxes across the entire county. That means all school building costs would be totaled up for all districts in the county and a uniform countywide rate would be levied to meet those costs.

That makes sense because good public education benefits everyone. Senior citizens with no children in school depend on well-educated young people to pay their Social Security and keep the economy strong so their investments do well. Many of the children and grandchildren of east-side empty-nesters will be buying their first homes on the west side.

Story continues below
In time, the situation will correct itself as the booming west side is built out with residences and wealth-producing businesses that pay property taxes. Kennecott Utah Copper has been paying healthy property taxes for many decades, helping build schools across the valley.

Ideally, legislative action would occur in a special session this summer because some east-side areas may place small district proposals on the election ballot this fall. Before people vote, it would be nice to know the tax ramifications.

If capital outlay taxes were equalized, the benefits of small districts could be pursued without tax unfairness. It makes sense to create school districts around municipal or multimunicipal boundaries. Districts that are contained within a city or a couple of cities get more attention from city leaders, and there is a stronger feeling of belonging and community pride.

Salt Lake City, Provo, Logan and Murray, for example, have school districts matching city boundaries. Public education has emerged as a big issue in the Salt Lake City mayoral race.

So bring on smaller districts. But make it fair.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Real Salt Lake advances to MLS Cup

I guess that is why "they play the game" as Herman Edwards would say.. ...

BYU happy to escape with victory

What was the score of the LSU vs LA tech game? Alot closer than you'd like to...

Has Fedor not said that THIS IS OUR YEAR all year long? Go back and...

This is just a small glimpse of the future with Obamacare: corruption, waste...

TCU plows past Utes, 55-28

I Bleed Blue | 9:44 p.m. Nov. 14, 2009 Wow! What a beat down. The second...

This is another reason soccer is a sad sport, a team that just makes the...

Make sure this is on the front page!! If you insist on mentioning that the U...

TCU plows past Utes, 55-28

I am glad Utah got a lesson in humility today. You were getting obnoxious...

Jazz hope D-Will returns soon

let me level with you..... Greg Miller does not really care what the majority...

The Last times I felt this proud of our Utah Sports Teams, was Beck to...

Advertisements
Advertisement