From Deseret News archives:

Reader responses regarding "The Mormons" PBS series

Published: Thursday, May 3, 2007 12:10 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
It all boils down to this: If you did not have a testimony of the gospel, Joseph Smith, and the church, this documentary won't help you gain one. If you do have a testimony and knowledge of the aforementioned, this documentary won't change your heart and mind. There will not be an exodus to or from the church by members or non-members, and I doubt many hearts or minds will be changed either way because of the documentary.

No matter the content, explanations, questions, or answers, there will always be the dissenters, and the non-believers, which is okay because here is the crux of the whole issue. As long as there are loose ends, questions, opinion, false information, discrimination, hate or whatever else you choose, it all comes down to one thing. Money; and how much money can be generated through books, documentaries and videos.

Unfortunately for me, this documentary leaves me aching to tell, "the rest of the story." I'll continue to wait for the "documentary" that truly shows, asks, tells, and calms the dissenters' lack of knowledge. This documentary did little to help the non-Mormon know much more than they all ready knew, but at least it was with much more diligence than has been accomplished in the past.

Thank You for allowing me to comment. — Lloyd Lewis, Montrose Colorado

Story continues below
The presentation was an interesting production with considerable research evident. I would proffer a couple of comments on important omissions that would clarify important concepts of doctrine and provide better understanding of this period of history and the background of the LDS Church.

The format seemed to suggest an impression that the beginnings of the church were the brainchild of Joseph Smith. While he was instrumental in bringing these concepts to fruition, he and all succeeding leaders were and have been adamant in stating that it was not Joseph's Church, nor Brigham's Church, nor Spencer's Church, nor Gordon's Church. It is a restoration of that organization instituted by the Savior himself in the meridian of times. That acclaim rightfully belongs to He whose name it bears, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

The account of succession of leadership following the assassination of Joseph Smith to Brigham Young seemed weak and unsupported by proper documentation. The fact that leadership organizations such as the Quorum of Twelve Apostles, and others were ordained and in place to support the presidency and provide a continuation of priesthood authority, was thinly intimated or entirely absent.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

"So can you feel the love? Max Hall's post game comments are far from humble...

4 police officers shot dead in Wash.

Oh my goodness!!! That is a so sad! My husband is a police officer and I can...

Nobody wanted to play BYU in its bowl game in 1984. So there is no asterisk...

embarrased by his remarks. He is not right, so I won't get over it. Get...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

Again the Utah fans are poor little victims. Two years ago it was mean...

Marriage definitions vary widely

There's two very different issues: 1) must society call homosexual unions by...

Win or lose the Utah State fans stay for everything. Those are what real...

What C.A. is saying is that alcohol is a destroyer. It's true.

Oh quit saying that only a few Utah fans are classless. I refuse to ever go...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

As a Utah graduate and a fan of Runnin' Ute football for 40 years, I have to...

Advertisements