From Deseret News archives:
Choice = fewer choices
Which, on the surface, seems like a great idea. Studies indicate that even in homes that receive hundreds of channels, the majority of viewing is on fewer than 10 channels and fewer than 20 are watched for any significant length of time.
If I never watch MTV, why should I be forced to pay for MTV?
If I go to the grocery store to buy bread, milk and eggs, should I be forced to buy beer and pretzels?
But ... as with so many things that seem so simple, the question of cable choice is a great deal more complicated. The simple fact is that if cable choice were to go into effect, most of our cable choices would disappear.
The vast majority of cable networks survive on the income from cable subscribers. When you pay your bill every month, a few cents up to a couple dollars goes to each channel that is "bundled" in whatever package you're paying for.
So, you ask, why not just get rid of the least popular channels? Isn't that how the free-market system works?
Most (if not all) of these channels would not survive. Instead of hundreds of channels, there might be a couple dozen.
And even the most popular channels, like Nickelodeon and ESPN, would have to start charging HBO-like subscription fees every month, for example.
So a la carte could mean fewer choices and higher prices.
The current push to convince the Federal Communications Commission to force cable and satellite companies to offer channels a la carte comes from groups claiming to work for the good of families and children. They're determined to keep channels like MTV, Spike and FX out of their homes.
What they're overlooking is that a lot of great kids channels would disappear if they get their way. Nickelodeon and the Disney Channels would no doubt survive, but the chances of Discovery Kids, Animal Planet, Toon Disney, Noggin, ABC Family and Hallmark surviving in an a la carte world are slim to none.
I urge parents to regulate what their kids watch. I support keeping kids from watching channels that are inappropriate for them.
But we already have that capability not only can our TVs block channels, but so can our cable and satellite systems.
In theory, a la carte sounds like a great idea. In practice, it would be anything but.
E-mail: pierce@desnews.com
Comments
- French, Afghan troops push on 10:47 a.m.
- In quieter Baghdad, bingo is back 10:45 a.m.
- Germans ID convert as terror suspect 10:44 a.m.
- Serb Patriarch Pavle dies 10:25 a.m.
- Palin's way of talkin' dissected 10:24 a.m.
- Sponsor for gay-rights bills found 9:53 a.m.
- Aggies beat Spartans in snowy Logan 4:31 a.m.
- TCU 55, Utah 28 4:24 a.m.
- BYU 24, New Mexico 19 4:21 a.m.
- Jazz game at a glance 3:00 a.m.
- SLC council OKs gay rights policies
359 - BYU happy to escape with victory
206 - Editorial: Mormons and gay rights
200 - TCU creams U.
162 - Will state consider gay rights law?
148 - Can BYU root for (ick) Utah Utes?
130 - Letters: Strange breed in Utah
130 - Utes remain silent about BCS
120 - Celtics crush Jazz
104 - Sloan may toy with starting lineup
87
As distressing as it was to see KUTV's longtime vice president/general...
Meghan McCain, the daughter of former presidential candidate John...
Most Americans are socially moderate and fiscally conservative. This...
For businessmen a free market is when the government stands aside and does...
Our school rocks we can beat anybody u throw at us
"55 points seems like a lot, but TCU is really good" I just have one thing...
Just look at yesterday.
You DID play your best.... and to all the Ute fans... WE ALL knew this...
I am a retired Ph.D. professor of linguistics. Yes, to academics it is a...
Stop being all giddy when you get on game day. If you really want to make a...
are exactly what the Cougar fans have been saying all year long. A good but...
If nobody cares about this story then why did comment on it? Way to prove...



You can be the first to comment on this story.