Friendly split for Pleasant Grove, Lindon?

Fire, police, ambulance service costs are issue

Published: Saturday, April 14, 2007 12:10 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
PLEASANT GROVE — After 25 years of sharing fire, police and ambulance services, Pleasant Grove and Lindon are now considering an amicable separation.

Pleasant Grove Mayor Mike Daniels said the "parting of the ways" may come because, as both cities have grown, operational costs have increased to the point at which Lindon would like a more detailed accounting and greater control over the services it is paying for. But Pleasant Grove isn't prepared to give Lindon what it wants.

"(Lindon) would like an accountability that we can't give them," Daniels said. "They want to know what they're paying for, and we're not really set up that way to provide the level of detail that they want. We can provide things like how many calls they had and how long those calls took, but if you start getting into the nitty-gritty of the type of call that was answered and was it more important or less important than another call ... you start to get into a level of reporting that we don't track."

Lindon has been linked to Pleasant Grove since 1982, but most recently, the city has been spending slightly more than $1.4 million per year for police, fire, EMS, animal control and dispatch services.

Story continues below

About a year ago, both cities considered forming a special service district to solidify their unity and possibly reconfigure their costs, but Daniels said the union would not have benefited Pleasant Grove as much as maintaining their own department currently does.

Now Lindon officials must decide if they want to branch out on their own, partner with another city or stay with Pleasant Grove for at least another year.

"Our overall philosophy as a city has been we feel that partnering with other entities means ... better service collectively, probably for less cost," said Lindon Mayor Jeff Acerson. "We feel that's a good working principle, but we may ... be big enough now that the viewpoint may change a bit, and we may be wise and prudent to provide that service by ourselves."

Daniels said Pleasant Grove hopes to know within a month or two whether the partnership will continue after July 1, 2008 — the beginning of the cities' next fiscal year. If Lindon decides to establish its own emergency service system, Daniels said Pleasant Grove will help them.

"Just because we're all looking at accountability to our areas, nobody should misunderstand that (our) cities don't have a good working relationship," Daniels said. "We're just trying to figure out how to best address the needs of our cities without creating a total fiasco for those involved."

Still, some Pleasant Grove employees who serve both cities say they're worried that a split could weaken their ability to build specialized emergency services, such as SWAT teams or canine units.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Good for Milsap, but whatever he does, he's got to get rid of this Ara...

Jazz brass debate Millsap match

no one griped last year when millie was getting paid 700.000. jazz could have...

I have always thought we invaded Iraq out of boredom; the 50 united states...

To the 3:37 commentator, Actually the 12:07 commentator was doing a lot...

Hey Kent- First of all, the Stadium of Fire is NOT a BYU production. ...

Leave him where he is and make him work or pay to stay there.

And let's put the blame where it all belongs....on Hedo. If he hadn't...

Just when you think Utah could not possibly get any more ridiculous,...

To the 10:51 commentator, Did I say he should not be on the sex offender...

To CJ3: How many centers out there really are their teams toughest post...

Advertisements