New law hurts competition
Now the world's largest Internet search engine is crying foul. The new law, titled the Trademark Protection Act, hurts consumers, violates free speech and is inconsistent with U.S. trademark law and capitalism, a Google spokesman is quoted as saying in press reports.
Effectively, the bill aims to rein in a practice in North America in which Google and other Web sites charge competing businesses to make their advertising appear when people search for the rival company or product. Utah's law would enable companies to register their trademarks to protect them from competitors who seek to buy the right to key off of those brands. Companies with registered trademarks could sue search engines and competitors if such ads turn up in Utah-based Internet searches.
Rep. Dave Clark, R-Santa Clara, who co-sponsored the legislation, told The Associated Press that the practice is tantamount to a business rival meeting a customer at the front door of a business and whisking him away to the other store.
But, isn't that the point of advertising? Isn't this really a matter of clever ad placement? Isn't it a matter of one company playing the game better than another? Doesn't it benefit consumers to have more choices?
Could it be that Americans are still adjusting to a different form of advertising? How is capitalizing on a keyword that much different than a department store placing its shoe advertisement on an opposing page from another department store's shoe ad? There are a handful of television commercials for competing automobile dealers during nearly every nightly news broadcast.
The Internet creates a brave new world of commerce. Government's primary focus needs to be protecting consumers. Businesses and the market can figure out the advertising dynamics on their own.
Comments
- Plenty of fantasy films for families 7:22 p.m.
- So you think you're the next Rowling? 7:21 p.m.
- 'Bomber' is about more than candy 7:21 p.m.
- Tips for getting published 7:21 p.m.
- Galleries 7:21 p.m.
- Duet of artists at Meyer Gallery 7:21 p.m.
- Spain's armor on view in D.C. 7:21 p.m.
- Stage auditions 7:21 p.m.
- 'As You Like It's' Parrett is a joy 7:21 p.m.
- 'Star spangled Girl' among openings 7:21 p.m.
- Jazz brass debate Millsap match
- LDS seminary principal arrested
- 2 men cited on LDS plaza
- Jazz finances not quite so bleak
- Logan canal breaks; 3 to 4 missing
- Utahns among Texans' investors
- Reactions on Boozer speculation
- Millsap offer: $10.3M up front
- Cash for Clunkers to get rolling soon
- HBO defends U. logo use in 'Love'
- LDS seminary principal arrested
332 - Jazz brass debate Millsap match
193 - 2 men cited on LDS plaza
165 - Jazz talking Boozer trade?
141 - Bronco collecting a galaxy of recruits
141 - Blazers may offer Millsap a contract
124 - Stadium of Fire flag burning was fake
101 - Fairness of BCS debated
83 - Letters: Single-payer system best
76 - Services bids farewell to Jackson
70
By now you've probably read about the investigation that showed just how...
Sen. Scott Jenkins was name-checked by Jay Leno Monday night during his...
Jerry's system doesn't win championships. Phil's triangle Offense does. 10...
Glad your not coming to visit us-- we have enough radicals and shallow people...
2 or more years, Millsap is not worth more than the MLE. If you look at the...
We have been praying for you ever since we heard. We are so sorry for you.
I don't believe the Jazz will sign Price. They didn't want him last year....
Why does everyone think that Portland signed Millsap to hurt Utah? Makes no...
Why does everyone think that Portland signed Millsap to hurt Utah? Makes no...
This began as an issue of private property rights. In response to a request...
How ignorant so many people are who continue to make comments here. No one...
Ultra Dem--I don't see eminent domain wouldn't work--unless you mean...



You can be the first to comment on this story.