From Deseret News archives:

LDS at Y. called too deferential to Bush

Published: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 12:23 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
PROVO — Most LDS students at Brigham Young University are too deferential to the Bush administration, a BYU professor said Monday during a panel discussion about Vice President Dick Cheney and the war on terror.

Professor Scott Cooper said many BYU conservatives refuse to question President Bush or Cheney on virtually anything, but he agreed with another panelist that much of the faculty is just the opposite.

Professor Ralph Hancock said, "It is hard to find someone on the faculty willing to say something good about the administration."

During the 90-minute discussion at the Varsity Theater in the Wilkinson Student Center, Hancock, like the other three political science professors on the panel, criticized some decisions made by Bush and Cheney.

The panelists all agreed that BYU's Board of Trustees made a respectable decision when it invited Cheney to speak at commencement on April 26.

"The real question is: Where do we go from here?" Middle East expert Donna Lee Bowen said after the discussion. "We have people thinking and talking. Who else can we bring in to make people think harder?"

Story continues below
A desire for deeper thought and better questions led Cooper to express concern for what he said is increased polarity in American political dialogue. He sees a growing tendency on both the political left and right to overlook the faults of those on their "team."

First, he took on the far left, saying it is too critical of Bush and Cheney when it vilifies them and portrays Cheney as "the evil puppetmaster of the president."

But on the right, Cooper said, too many Americans, especially many members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints at BYU, are willing to give the Bush administration a free pass.

"Instead of vocal criticism of poor policies, they say, 'I support the president,' 'I respect the office,' and nothing else," he said. "It's the Pied Piper model of American politics. This model is an electoral monarchy. We elect a king and allow him to do what he wants for four or eight years."

Cooper said the philosophy is more pronounced among members of the LDS Church, who he said especially practice it if the president is known to pray.

"I don't think Mormons would be as deferential to presidential power if Bill Clinton were the one fighting the war on terror."

Christensen said feminist groups that supported Clinton engaged in similar evasion during the Monica Lewinsky affair. "They said, 'We don't need to look at that; let's look at his record,'" Christensen said. "Even when it might be the right thing to do, some can't bring themselves to agree with criticism of their candidate."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

At BYU, Ralph Hancock, left, Scott Cooper and Darrin Hawkins discuss Vice President Cheney and the war on terror.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Global warming a lie

12:24 p.m. You state that "we've had cloud seeding for over 100 years"......

Letters: Democrats' ethics

We don't need no stinkin' ethics reform. 'Specially not ordered by the likes...

Pearl Harbor survivor returns

Today marks the 68th anniversary of the attacks on the United States fleet at...

ugly Republican power grab from the Nixon era. [sarcasm, off]

Why is Y. ignoring spew of hatred?

"It is between the school and Max. It's not the publics business." I...

Imagine Copenhagen Rule number 956: Please keep your dogs from passing gas.

BJ should of thought about all of this, the Eco Terroism Act when he did the...

You're Welcome

Nice red herring.

Almost right, after world cup qualifying the BCS would then have picked...

Advertisements