Account for rec shortfall

Published: Sunday, April 1, 2007 12:06 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Two of Salt Lake County Mayor Peter Corroon's most admirable traits are his insistence that Salt Lake County government is accountable to the people and that county residents get the best bang for their tax buck.

The recent discovery that the county is $19 million short on 25 recreation projects seems to defy those standards. Last November, voters approved a $63.5 million bond to start construction on trails and new recreation centers, and to make other capital improvements. Now county officials say that the true cost of the projects will far exceed the bond, due to low-ball estimates and inflation costs.

Inflation costs? Come now. The November election was four months ago and there hasn't been a great economic downturn since. Low-ball estimates may be a more plausible explanation, but it's still difficult to comprehend how cost projections could be off by nearly a third of the value of the bond.

Corroon and the Salt Lake County Council, which placed this proposition on the ballot, need to be held to account for the gross inaccuracies of these projections. After all, voters should have some confidence that the backers of the proposition had firm cost projections before placing the matter on the ballot. Voters should get that for which they agree to pay.

Story continues below

For its part, the County Council passed a resolution assuring cities that the county will not break its promise to pay out the full $63.5 million in ZAP tax that voters approved. The money just won't go as far. The council has not yet determined what to do about the shortfall.

For starters, the County Council needs to insist upon an audit of these cost projections. Were voters promised more than the county reasonably could deliver? How could these estimates be so wrong?

Corroon has recommended that the county use the $20 million intended for the construction of a parking garage at the South Towne Exposition Center to offset the inflationary construction costs of the recreation projects. This would be a simple solution to the county's $19 million shortfall, but the larger issue is the flawed cost projections.

Some projects will cost $6 million to $7.5 million more than previous estimates. County residents deserve a better explanation for these "shortfalls" than "inflation."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News Archives

previousnext

Latest comments

wow! i cant believe this! he was a great man and no one expected this. he...

Just another example of the skewed world of professional sports...true...

LDS seminary principal is arrested in sexual abuse

wow!! he lied to so many!!!!!!

I forgot what I was going to say. Let's go ride bikes!

I have had it up to here......next time I am voting for Prop Hate!

Everyone here blames the victim over the teacher in these cases...regardless...

"friend says..." dang typos.

LDS institutions will not crack down more on this issue...they tend to...

In economic bad times if your neighbor is out of a job, it's a recession. If...

Nice Turns, Tatiana! Nice behind too ;)

Advertisements