Utah's 'one-party system' not beneficial

During the 2006 election, one local Republican candidate ran against his Democratic opponent arguing his district deserved "a representative in the Utah State Legislature who is seen as more than an interloper in a one-party system." There was a time when a "one-party system" was something to be ashamed of, but apparently not any more.

Being perceived as a "one-party" state has not exactly resulted in better treatment for Utah citizens from previous Republican-controlled Congresses or the White House. Having our votes taken for granted by the Republican Party has proven bad for both the democratic process we hold dear and for our state in general.

Perhaps the most glaring recent example was the proposed Divine Strake test. Though eventually cancelled, it took considerable outcry from the citizens of Utah. Having Republican congressmen like Chris Cannon speak favorably of the test didn't help matters.

The Republican Party demonstrated again this month why enjoying solid support in Utah won't translate easily into benefits for our state. Utah has been seeking a fourth congressional district since the 2000 Census. The Utah Legislature was even called back into special session in 2006 to redraw district boundaries in anticipation of the lame-duck Republican Congress finally taking some action on the proposal. They never did.

Within 48 hours of Democrats passing a bill out of committee earlier this month giving Utah the fourth congressional district it has been seeking for seven years, President Bush announced his opposition to it. No more than a couple of days passed before Sen. Bob Bennett declared the bill's chances in the Senate practically zero as a result.

Republicans serving on Utah's Capitol Hill are not immune to the arrogance that comes with almost absolute power over the legislative process. Public opinion polls have consistently shown strong support among Utahns for their neighborhood public schools. In spite of this fact, vouchers passed the House by one vote and the Senate by nine votes without a single Democrat voting in favor in either chamber.

Popular reforms that consistently enjoy two-thirds support or greater including the creation of a bipartisan redistricting committee, banning or further limiting gifts from lobbyists to legislators, and prohibiting legislators from using campaign funds for personal purposes rarely received a hearing in committee, let alone a vote on the floor of the House or Senate.