From Deseret News archives:

Utah Supreme Court shoots down sex abuse case

Published: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 9:32 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Utah Supreme Court on Tuesday came down against two adult brothers who claimed they had been sexually abused as boys by a Catholic priest 30 years ago, ruling that the statute of limitations has run out.

Ralph Louis Colosimo and Charles Matthew Colosimo in 2003 filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit against the Diocese of Salt Lake, Judge Memorial High School and other parties. They sought damages for what they said they had suffered after being sexually abused in the 1970s by a now-defrocked priest, James Rapp, who taught at the high school and also was a trusted family friend.

Rapp currently is in prison serving a 40-year sentence after pleading no contest to sexually violating a boy in Oklahoma.

The high court ruling ends the Colosimos' legal battle.

Their lawsuit was dismissed by 3rd District Judge Paul Maughan, but the Colosimos pursued an appeal. The Utah Supreme Court in 2005 agreed to review a narrow issue of their case: "Whether plaintiffs' awareness of sexual abuse entailed a reasonable knowledge of, or a duty to inquire about, the facts necessary to support claims that the defendants knew of the abuse and failed to adequately supervise the perpetrator or to prevent the abuse."

Story continues below
The Colosimos had argued the institutions that employed and supervised Rapp knew he had sexually abused boys before, but deliberately concealed it to protect their own interests.

Under Utah law, an individual has four years after his or her 18th birthday to bring a legal claim.

The Colosimos maintained that, in their case, the statue of limitations was "tolled," or suspended, because they had a right to conduct discovery to get evidence regarding what the various institutions knew about Rapp.

Ralph Colosimo had said he had repressed memories of the abuse that surfaced in therapy. Charles Colosimo said he never forgot it, but did not make a connection between the abuse and his injuries until years later in therapy.

However, the Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled unanimously that the discovery rule did not toll the statute of limitations.

"In this case, the Colosimos knew that they had been abused and that Rapp was the abuser. They also knew or were constructively on notice of the relationships between Rapp and the institutional defendants and of the duties owed to them by those institutional defendants," the ruling stated.

The high court also said if it followed the arguments put forth by the Colosimos, claims against someone like Rapp would be subject to the statute of limitations, but other "remote" entities would remain liable indefinitely. "We fail to see the logic in such a scheme," the ruling said.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

TCU creams U.

Congratulations to TCU! You are a deserving team and maybe the best team in...

Bennett has broken this solemn oath to only serve 2 terms - Why would you...

TCU stays 4th in AP; Y. 19th, U. 23rd

has been restored TCU > BYU > Utah AP/Coaches #4/#4 TCU #19/#18 BYU ...

TCU creams U.

I'm not stu-pid like Bob2. Both teams got destroyed by TCU. Different...

5A: Davis runs over Hunter

Hinds will run over 100 yards on Friday and it will be a good game. Bingham...

Hugh Nibley's coded language

I would suppose that only an African American Latterday Saint would be...

Summits are the tops of mountains and pretentious meetings of those who are...

Presidential summits look good

I would put the selection on my resume! Of course, like, Ann McFetters...

Utes exposed

How condescending is that? Throughout Urban Meyer's 2 years, Cougar fan...

Love ya, Tom. You are so right.

Advertisements
Advertisement