From Deseret News archives:

Y. students' search for records falters

Plans they sought to access may not be considered public

Published: Monday, March 12, 2007 1:44 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Twenty BYU communications students set out to exercise open records laws as part of a nationwide public records audit but ran into an unexpected snag: The records they requested may not be considered public.

Students traveled to 22 of Utah's 29 counties to act as citizens and ask to inspect each county's Comprehensive Emergency Response Plan. Many students reported that county employees questioned their motives and in many instances they were denied access to the documents.

However, it was later determined that a closer look at state and federal law showed the Comprehensive Emergency Response Plan can be considered protected under the Government Records Access and Management Act, or GRAMA.

After being told by the Utah Attorney General's Office that the documents were restricted, Joel Campbell, BYU assistant professor in the department of communications, said he took a closer look at the law.

"Apparently there was some confusion created," Campbell said.

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, many federal, state and local government agencies moved to keep details of local emergency response plans from public access, mainly out of concern they could land in the hands of terrorists.

Story continues below
Many Utah counties contacted by the BYU students outright refused public access to any information about their plans, while a good number of them said the plan was being revised and not available because it had not been officially adopted.

Campbell said there were a few counties that at least tried to balance the public's interest with security concerns by providing some information.

"In today's world of threats of violence and terrorism, a county official charged with law enforcement responsibilities, as some who were contacted, could and probably should be suspicious about releasing such information," said Brent Gardner, executive director for the Utah Association of Counties.

Campbell said that given the confusion created by the project, county officials should receive the benefit of the doubt that they were doing what the law expects of them.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

All lawyer/legal tactics aside, there are only three ultimate possibilities:...

"I read they do like people w/ accounting degrees and/or people of the LDS...

Utah man dies in Oregon crash

God was only aiming for one of us. The rest of us have minor bumps bruises,...

Welcome sir ! You're extremely important to all of us ! Thank you for your...

FBI names new Salt Lake office head

Welcome to the Salt Lake City Field Office Mr. McTighe. Maybe we'll get some...

Baby-bottle dangers

Interesting article, but don't understand the danger of non carbon receipts....

Letters: A poisonous potion

The "progressives" and "liberals" who think that the Constitution has no...

Utah Jazz: Miles has cast removed

Soon we will see if CJ is as good as you think he is?? I'm not sure he would...

That's kind of the point. Most people don't mind Bingham or Alta saying they...

JD you and your school SS are nothing but losers! your season is over!!!!!!...

Advertisements
Advertisement