From Deseret News archives:

5% single-rate tax likely

Published: Friday, Feb. 23, 2007 11:59 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Utah's flat-rate income tax is dead — even before it actually took effect.

Instead, Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. and GOP legislative leaders said Thursday that Utah should move to a single-rate personal income tax system of 5 percent that is "credit-based, not deduction-based."

The new plan floated by Huntsman seems on its way to adoption, although House Republicans wanted to take at least one more day to mull it over. Across the whole state, the plan means a $97 per taxpayer income tax reduction on income earned in 2008.

Senate Republicans, who have long backed the governor's efforts at tax reform, are ready to approve it, Senate President John Valentine, R-Orem, said after the Senate majority's closed caucus Thursday.

"This proposal will pass the Senate," Valentine said. "Our caucus really likes the proposal. It seems to meet all of the qualities we've been looking for — a 5 percent rate, a much simpler system."

Huntsman, too, was enthusiastic. "We're encouraged by our initial feedback," the governor said, promising "endless patience" as lawmakers deliberate the proposal that he said would be the final step in tax reform.

Story continues below
"This, if it is manifest in its current form, very much represents to me our endpoint in tax reform," the governor said. "It will make our state a whole lot more competitive and conducive to growth and the attraction of capital than we've ever been in our history."

House Republicans, though, weren't so sure. "If we take this fork in the road, "where does this end?" asked Rep. Brad Daw, R-Orem,

"This is the end," said House Speaker Greg Curtis, R-Sandy.

There would be only one income tax system when taxpayers prepare their tax returns on income earned in 2007.

Under the new proposal, Utahns would get a $110 million income tax cut, enough money — along with the lower 5 percent rate — for all taxpayers to see a reduction in their income taxes.

But, admitted Curtis, there would be winners and bigger winners, depending on all kinds of factors: Amount of income, whether you take the standard deduction on your federal return or itemize, the size of your family, the amount of your mortgage interest payments or charitable giving.

But even tax experts, like Rep. Wayne Harper, R-West Jordan, were unclear what the new income tax compromise means.

"It is not a flat tax, that's for sure," said Harper, co-chairman of a former task force that studied tax reform for months a year ago.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Editorial: 10 years of TRAX

Sorry earlier I meant to say that tracks seems to travel at 35 miles an hour...

'Peter Frumhoff, the director of science and policy at the Union of...

The Non-BCS crowd ought to create their own title game...their own brand, and...

Letters: Democrats' ethics

That's the whole of your defense of GOP resistance to badly-needed ethics...

Your criticism should hardly be focused on Bennett alone. What about all the...

'Wired's Threat Level blog reported on November 20 that Gavin Schmidt, a...

The reality of climate change is supported by multiple lines of evidence and...

BYU professor remembered

I had the priviledge of staying in the LeBaron home on severl occasions as I...

Letters: Growing jobless rate

So the unemployment rate has dropped to "just" 10%, huh? I wonder what that...

Ahh for the love of money...what money can buy!!!

Advertisements