Shelve immigration 'omnibus' bill

Published: Sunday, Feb. 25, 2007 12:07 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Utah Legislature can waste as much time as it wants debating immigration reforms. In the end, any substantive reform has to come from Congress. Thus far, the subject hasn't reached the top of its agenda.

This should not be construed as an open invitation for state legislatures to make life miserable for illegal immigrants. They are in our midst and they have legitimate health and education needs. We have a moral obligation to assist the strangers among us.

For awhile, it appeared that the Utah Legislature would give these issues a rest, particularly with respect to a law that extends in-state college tuition to Utah residents, some of whom happen to be illegal immigrants or the children of illegal immigrants.

In fact, they are very few in number. It is counter-intuitive to provide a free public education to Utah children — regardless of status — then shut the door of opportunity when they qualify for college academically.

Yet the debate has legs. An omnibus bill that may as well be titled the "Let's curb illegals once and for all Act," is lurking on Capitol Hill. HB347 seeks to repeal in-state tuition for qualified undocumented immigrants and further deny them access to any public benefits, except those mandated under federal law.

Story continues below

The bill advanced from a committee and is now before the Rules Committee. Legislative leaders should let it die a quiet death.

For one, the tuition issue has been debated and debated without altering the current law on state books. Surely, the Legislature, in its waning days, has more substantive issues to attend to.

Moreover, what is the point of this bill? State agencies already use a federal verification system to verify eligibility for social services programs. This is, at best, redundant.

Instead of stirring this hornet's nest, wouldn't the state's time be better spent on a comprehensive study of undocumented workers' contributions and the cost of the services of which they partake? Then, at least, the debate could be fact-based, instead of fueled by raw emotion.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News archives

previousnext

Latest comments

I am confident that Glen Beck has the read the book by Gary Allen,NONE DARE...

The best thing we could do would be to get rid of all the people in DC who...

He would not pull out a whip, that's for sure. You people must read a...

Jazz brass debate Millsap match

i havent read anything about 20 mil. i read 32 to 36 mil not confirmed. 15...

Enter comment Introduzca comentario ¡¡Por Dios!! Esto no es cosa del...

When I was 16, I thought the world of my seminary teachers. They all talked...

Girls/Ladies/Women, let me first introduce reality into this discussion. In...

Obviously you don't get my point. They were non-violent resisters. They were...

PRESIDENT CLINTON was guilty of the SAME KIND OF CRIME. An older man in a...

Ah, The Religion of Peace! :-)

Advertisements