From Deseret News archives:

Shelve immigration 'omnibus' bill

Published: Sunday, Feb. 25, 2007 12:07 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Utah Legislature can waste as much time as it wants debating immigration reforms. In the end, any substantive reform has to come from Congress. Thus far, the subject hasn't reached the top of its agenda.

This should not be construed as an open invitation for state legislatures to make life miserable for illegal immigrants. They are in our midst and they have legitimate health and education needs. We have a moral obligation to assist the strangers among us.

For awhile, it appeared that the Utah Legislature would give these issues a rest, particularly with respect to a law that extends in-state college tuition to Utah residents, some of whom happen to be illegal immigrants or the children of illegal immigrants.

In fact, they are very few in number. It is counter-intuitive to provide a free public education to Utah children — regardless of status — then shut the door of opportunity when they qualify for college academically.

Yet the debate has legs. An omnibus bill that may as well be titled the "Let's curb illegals once and for all Act," is lurking on Capitol Hill. HB347 seeks to repeal in-state tuition for qualified undocumented immigrants and further deny them access to any public benefits, except those mandated under federal law.

Story continues below
The bill advanced from a committee and is now before the Rules Committee. Legislative leaders should let it die a quiet death.

For one, the tuition issue has been debated and debated without altering the current law on state books. Surely, the Legislature, in its waning days, has more substantive issues to attend to.

Moreover, what is the point of this bill? State agencies already use a federal verification system to verify eligibility for social services programs. This is, at best, redundant.

Instead of stirring this hornet's nest, wouldn't the state's time be better spent on a comprehensive study of undocumented workers' contributions and the cost of the services of which they partake? Then, at least, the debate could be fact-based, instead of fueled by raw emotion.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News archives

previousnext

Latest comments

So are you saying that women's soccor should evolve into this type of...

The Church has never been about hating gays, or any other group. It has only...

Hatch empathizes with Muslims

To which I add Amen, and Amen! [Thank you!]

RSL in win-Windy City situation

this is going to so much fun? Gee who do i cheer for if REAL plays Galaxy? ...

Hall would rather take a hit

The great QBs make defenses pay for bringing pressure. Hall offers up...

I completely concur, this exhibition game was supposed to be easy and a blow...

Maybe we should just back up 50 years and do away with all laws etc. passed...

So does Hall enjoy absorbing the contact as Call says, or in Hall's own...

Well put, let it die. A lot people who want the health care bill haven't...

D-Will, Price sit out Jazz practice

If Jerry studies "game tape" he will see how to beat the Celtics, see Phoenix...

Advertisements
Advertisement