From Deseret News archives:

House tightens gift rules, but the lunch is still free

Published: Monday, Feb. 19, 2007 8:20 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Perhaps it could be called the free meal exception.

Monday, the Utah House passed a lobbyist gift bill that would require more disclosure of legislators who take gifts from lobbyists paid to influence them.

However, the GOP majority in the House exempted all meals up to $50 from the disclosure measure — a disappointment to the reform-minded lawmakers who want to curtail such gifts.

A Deseret Morning News examination of all gifts given to legislators in 2006, published last month, found that lobbyists paid for $67,196 worth of meals for the 104 part-time lawmakers — or on average $646 per legislator.

But by far most of those meals were less than $50, so lobbyists didn't name which legislators took the free meals. And continuation of that no-naming meal policy was specifically put into HB178 Monday, meaning that about half of all the money spent on legislators would not come with a legislator's name attached.

Story continues below
In morning floor action, when House Minority Leader Ralph Becker, the original sponsor of HB178, tried to make all meals fully reportable, most House Republicans (with Democratic Rep. James Gowans of Tooele) blocked his attempt — leaving what Becker termed a large loophole in legislative gift-taking reform.

So, as is now the case, legislators may continue taking meals less than $50 and their names would not be listed in the giving lobbyist's financial disclosure report. Claiming the new bill is "full disclosure" when half of all gifts would still be exempted from full disclosure is hardly a broad-sweeping reform, said Becker after the amended bill passed out of the House.

Still, the new HB178 — as changed by House Republicans — would require more reporting of a legislator's name in some cases.

The new bill also includes local and state government officials as lobbyists (they are exempt from that reporting now), and it contains a section that prohibits lobbyists from representing clients who have directly opposed stands — a so-called "conflict of interest" law for lobbyists.

Under current law, if a local mayor paid $45 for a legislator's round of golf, that wouldn't be reported at all. But under the new HB178, the mayor would have to file a report listing the legislator's name, the gift as golf and the $45 cost.

If the head of the Utah Department of Natural Resources took several legislators on a four-wheel-drive sightseeing tour (now not listed at all), that would be reported along with the legislators' names.

That change — government officials being listed as lobbyists — has been desired for some time, as a few legislators complained about government "lobbyist" activities that go unreported.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Discrimination is something we all do (and should do) every day. When we go...

Both parties disrespect Constitution

is genius. And the many of the poster hereon, provides the explanation. A...

To Anonymous @7:15 a.m., If you want to be free to rent your property only to...

And how is the Constitution to grow? I think the framers thought it would be...

Audit calls for end to 'double dipping'

If demand is there then what's the problem? If the state offers early...

Who cares, just want to see the big boys play, not the little leagues. You...

3A football: Wasatch vs. Juan Diego

JD is "that good" or they wouldn't be in the game. I assume Wasatch is also...

sounds like a great recruit, Now let's see what BYU will do with him, I'll...

Read the article. What does BYU's year of mediocrity have to do with...

This is ridiculous. Why are we rehiring people into their same positions...

Advertisements
Advertisement