From Deseret News archives:

Utah abortion bill opposed

52% don't support spending millions on fighting Roe

Published: Monday, Feb. 12, 2007 4:07 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A slight majority of Utahns do not support using millions of state dollars to fight the landmark abortion ruling Roe vs. Wade, despite top lawmakers' statements to the contrary.

In a new Dan Jones & Associates poll conducted for the Deseret Morning News and KSL-TV, just over half — 52 percent — opposed a proposed law to ban most abortions in the state and the legal challenge that would be sure to follow.

Forty-one percent either strongly or somewhat favor HB235, sponsored by Rep. Paul Ray, R-Clearfield. The bill would ban abortions except in cases of rape, incest or extreme medical necessity for the mother. It is intended to pose a challenge to Roe, in which the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973 recognized a woman's right to have an abortion.

The poll, conducted between Feb. 6 and 8, has a 5 percent margin of error.

Ray, joined by GOP Senate leaders, has said he believes the majority of Utahns would support state efforts to overturn Roe v. Wade and make abortion a state issue, rather than a federal one. The issue, he said, is not about views on abortion but on the cost of taking the case all the way to the Supreme Court.

"The big question, I think, from the citizens is, they don't know how much money (legal costs would require,)" Ray said.

Story continues below
Early cost estimates ranged from $2 million to $8 million to defend the admittedly unconstitutional bill. The Utah Attorney General's Office now estimates it would cost $1.3 million — nearly $440,000 per year for three years — to litigate HB235. The bill is expected to be debated today on the House floor.

While not included in the bill's fiscal note, the AG's office has also warned lawmakers that a one-time payment of up to $2 million may be necessary to pay plaintiffs' attorneys fees, depending on the outcome of the litigation, spokesman Paul Murphy said.

Despite the poll's findings, Senate President John Valentine, R-Orem, said he still believes Utahns, particularly in his district, would back the abortion challenge.

"In my area, it's very strongly supported to defend the rights of the unborn," he said.

Valentine said he has received positive feedback on the abortion ban during weekly town hall meetings with his constituents, who agree with the legislative leader that $3 million is about the maximum amount that should be allocated for the legal fight.

At least one of Ray's colleagues, however, believes that the price tag for a Roe challenge is too high. Rep. Stephen Urquhart, R-St. George, plans to introduce a substitute bill for a ban on abortion, but pending a challenge to Roe vs. Wade from another state.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

Palin: Aides kept her 'bottled up'

Gee, and all this time we thought it was her brain that kept her bottled up.

I-80 reconstruction finally done

Almost a year ahead of schedule. If you want Bedrock, go back to the years...

BLAH BLAH... BLAH BLAH BLAH..

Sarah Palin is real. And I'm glad the political machines and the drive-by...

Cougars land Vegas standout

Uhhh.....here's a rocket science equation for you: Two spots available = 2...

House passes health care bill

No liberal in this thread seems to want to tackle the problem of how to pay...

Ute's are going to smoke the Frog's this weekend and will be the busters...

Lit flicks: Holiday movie offerings

too good a book to adapt to film.

This was a bad decision by the LDS church, one that will come back and haunt...

Teams field good defenses

This whole year (and last year for that matter), the utes D has saved them....

Advertisements
Advertisement