From Deseret News archives:

Doubts cloud coal-plant plan

Pacificorp could be stalled by conflict over future power needs

Published: Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2007 9:33 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Global warming may wreak more havoc than rising temperatures and disappearing coastlines.

For PacifiCorp, the issue has left a big question mark over the utility's plans to build two new coal-fired power plants to meet Utah's skyrocketing electricity demands.

Couple those concerns with a brewing disagreement over just how much electricity Utah needs and who will pay for it, and the issue becomes even more pointed.

In January, the Oregon Public Utility Commission denied a request by PacifiCorp to pursue competitive bidding to build the proposed power plants, one in Utah by 2012 and another in Wyoming by 2013.

PacifiCorp — which operates in Utah as Rocky Mountain Power — has said it needs roughly 800 to 1,100 megawatts of electricity by 2013 to meet the demand of its customers in Utah, Idaho and Wyoming. A megawatt is enough electricity to power 500 to 750 typical homes.

But the utility's projections are exaggerated, according to regulators in Oregon, where PacifiCorp is based. The Oregon commission says PacifiCorp's projections are more than three times what is actually needed.

Story continues below
"Due to errors and omissions ... the company has significantly overestimated its resource needs," the Oregon PUC order said. "Before acquiring new thermal base load resources, we expect the company to fully explore conservation, demand response resources, renewable resources, distributed resources and short-term purchases."

Bob Jenks, executive director of the Oregon Citizens' Utility Board, a ratepayer group, said Oregon will not pay for Utah's dirty power.

"We think coal plants are tremendously risky," Jenks said. "In the life of a coal plant there is going to be significant regulation of carbon emissions. We don't know when it is going to come, but we know it is going to be significant."

In Utah, where 95 percent of the state's electricity is generated by coal, the idea of no new coal plants could be hard to swallow.

Paul Barber, senior analyst at Salt Lake-based Energy Strategies, which represents some of the state's largest industrial customers, said his clients are not opposed to the construction of a new coal plant. But the group is concerned about allegations that Utah's electricity demands have been overestimated.

"If you're overbuilt, that represents a cost that usually gets passed on to the customer," Barber said. "That's what happened in the '80s."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Gifts for gamers

There are some games I love not on your list. Arkham Asylum for one.

Daughter: Mitchell fed me my pet

Our parents made my brothers help kill and clean our rabbits before we ate...

Why would you keep it open? I would understand if there was a lot of amazing...

The government will run our health care well? Read Reader's Digest, November...

BCS stable at top, Y. up to 14

TCU stomped on the MWC so they are naturally ready to crush Florida, Alabama...

Jazz win 6th in 7 games

could you understand Dave Locke any more than my mom does and she is not even...

Notre Dame fires Weis

Attending the ND/BYU game 3 years ago in south bend, a couple of things stuck...

I missed the game, actually i heard a little bit of Locke on the radio (man...

Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal

quotes were good: Article was dumb and unnecessary.

Understanding translation process

I believe the art depicting Joseph looking at the plates may possibly be...

Advertisements