From Deseret News archives:

House approves Juab County water resolution

Published: Thursday, Jan. 25, 2007 12:07 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
In the words of Juab County rancher Cecil Garland, the state House of Representatives had a choice to make: "crops or craps."

By that, he meant crops grown by residents of his arid Western region, or a Nevada groundwater project that they fear could pipe their water to Las Vegas.

When the dice rolled Wednesday, Las Vegas crapped out.

The House unanimously approved, 73-0, HJR1, which calls for caution on making an agreement to facilitate the Clark, Lincoln and White Pine Counties Groundwater Development Project. The resolution now moves to the Senate.

The Nevada project is intended to extract about 160,000 acre-feet of water yearly from seven areas of that state, piping the water to Las Vegas and Lincoln County.

Spring Valley, which is entirely within Nevada, is to provide 91,000 acre-feet of water, while Snake Valley could provide up to another 27,000 acre-feet, according to the project's concept plan, dated March 2006.

Snake Valley straddles the Utah-Nevada border, and its aquifer may be connected to Spring Valley. The U.S. Geological Survey is studying groundwater resources of the area. The study should be finished late this year.

Story continues below
The Nevada project has drawn vehement objections from Utah and Nevada ranchers and environmentalists, among others. They fear the region on both sides of the border may be dried out by the massive project.

The resolution notifies the governors and officials of Utah and Nevada and the people of the area that the Legislature wants Gov. Jon M. Huntsman Jr. to carefully assess the project's "potential economic, social and environmental consequences in Utah."

It calls for public participation in developing any agreement with Nevada on the water project. Finally, it urges Huntsman "to refrain from entering into an agreement with Nevada until scientific studies are complete to ensure that there is an adequate scientific basis on which to form an agreement."

Rep. Kerry Gibson, R-Ogden, noted during floor debate Wednesday that a group of legislators traveled to the region. "We saw a very important and fragile ecosystem ... that is almost totally, completely dependent on access to that water," he said.

It would be easy for someone to say Las Vegas needs the water "more than a few of those individuals out in Snake Valley," he said. But "we have the right and the responsibility to protect water rights that are owned by our state, to protect the fragile resources of this state."

If sound science backs up the water scheme, "we'll sign an agreement," Gibson said. "But at this point, there's still much to be learned about exactly what that effect will be. I guarantee there'll be some effect."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Strange breed in Utah

And your fountain of wisdom is what, and originates from where?

3A football: Wasatch vs. Juan Diego

Juan Diego wins this game by 4 touchdowns. Wasatch just does not have the...

5A teams best of decade

Remember the theme of this article. Best team of the decade, as in this...

NBA's worry is Donaghy

Robinson's claims would be totally unbelievable if they didn't confirm...

Koerber faces 19 new charges

There are many more publicly known details of this case than are in this...

" G, looks like others are bringing facts to this and you keep providing a...

To An Observer | 4:52 p.m. Merriam-Webster: Socialism: 1 : any of...

PETA targets U. laboratories

"violation of federal guidelines in the treatment of lab mice"? Are you...

Audit calls for end to 'double dipping'

We have a principal at our school who is double dipping. What a great asset...

Once again, correlation vs. causation. Spaniards live longer than...

Advertisements
Advertisement