News out of touch with readers

Published: Tuesday, Jan. 16, 2007 12:26 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
I was disappointed in the Deseret Morning News' recent editorial piece, "Don't kill tuition break" (Jan. 7). Rather than addressing the issues on merit, the editors unfortunately resorted to name-calling, i.e. June Cleaver, and using the "race" card.

The Deseret Morning News editorial board is out of touch with most Utahns. Various issues were important to my constituents — education, transportation, rising health care costs and maintaining a moral environment for our children — but the most emotional was illegal immigration. Frankly, most Utahns are sick and tired of being called "heartless," "not understanding" or "racist" when they oppose illegal immigration. Dozens of my constituents spend weeks of their time and their own money on medical missions to Hispanic countries — my parents among them. Having a wife from the former Soviet Union and a business partner from Ethiopia, I can testify that race has nothing to do with it. The rule of law, fundamental fairness and the long-term survival of our nation are at stake.

If we do not like the law, we should try to change it. But it is our responsibility to follow the law until we succeed. This is a requirement of a civil society. The fact of the matter is that the 182 students in higher education are not the real concern but a symptom of a greater problem. Our heath care, social services and educational systems are at a breaking point. Estimates range from $70 million to $200 million to educate the children of illegal aliens in Utah. Talk to any hospital administrator and learn the costs illegal aliens place on the health-care system — costs that are subsidized by other taxpayers. When my wife first came to this county, I didn't have the assets to sponsor her, so I had to ask my father to help. He signed an affidavit that he would be responsible for all her costs to society, and so he made sure we got health insurance. We need to enforce current federal immigration sponsorship laws.

Story continues below

Concerns about the innocent victims (children) are often used in defense of illegal immigration, but the same excuse was used against welfare reform. Besides, who is better off, the children who received free education here and must return briefly to their parents' native country or the children who never left because their parents obeyed the law? Who is more destitute — a child from Mexico or one from Darfur? Who deserves a scholarship more — an illegal immigrant or an orphan from Ukraine who at 18 is forced out of the orphanage and often must work the street to survive?

There are practical concerns as well. Where are the illegal students going to work when they graduate? Should the state perpetuate the problem and promote additional illegal behavior? As recent headlines suggest, nothing good comes from ignoring our laws.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

GOP to call on firefighter Sotomayor ruled against

Right -- he has none. Ricci is not qualified to discuss Sotomayor's...

Farming for the needy

Dear Dave My daughter just converted to Mormonism. Now I see that the...

Um...Harry Potter didn't compete in the World Quidditch Cup...He attended it...

Skeptics not heretics

Who is Timj to judge which type of skeptic a person is? What type of...

The Hansens are truly inspiring. I am so pleased to read an article like...

Do more traveling

I never labeled those countries enemies. its just that you can't wander into...

Firms want health reform

Forget about Canada, lets bring in Cuban and French management to figure this...

Kill hate-crimes bill

As a liberal I am against the nasty conservative philosophy of a "God-given...

Science is not settled

And, even more so, the science-illterates of the just-prior administration.

Sorry --I don't believe you're BYU fan. Common sense and BYU fan don't go...

Advertisements