Elitist BCS is an insult to good teams

Published: Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2007 2:20 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
In America, we tend to go to great lengths to be fair.

There are racial quotas to provide equal opportunity.

There is a welfare program and a graduated tax system that demands more from the rich than the poor.

There are anti-trust laws to even the playing field in big business.

In America, nothing galls us more than the exclusion of people or groups of people because of something not related to ability.

That's why college football and the Bowl Championship Series drives us insane. It's wrongheaded, nonsensical and un-American.

I know we're over here in the B section of the newspaper, but there's a little war going on back in the D section that tends to transcend sports this time of year.

Last night, football teams from Florida and Ohio State met in Phoenix to decide the national championship. On this account, they failed, again, just as the BCS has failed in seven of the nine seasons since its creation.

This time it was unbeaten Boise State that could claim a portion of the national title, but, just like the University of Utah two years ago, the Broncos didn't get the opportunity to play for the championship. They played Oklahoma in the Fiesta Bowl a week earlier.

Story continues below

College football is the only sport in the world in which a team can complete a season unbeaten without winning the championship. It's happened 16 times in the past four decades.

Every winter, it starts again. Columnists, fans, politicians and the have-nots of college football rail against the unfairness of the BCS and call for a playoff system that would settle the championship on the field, not in a ballot box.

No matter how you cut it, no one can make sense of selecting a national champion pretty much the same way we choose a president.

It was voters who selected the two participants in last night's game. If voters could pick the best teams, we wouldn't need to play games on the field. If the BCS had been in charge of the NFL last year, the Pittsburgh Steelers wouldn't have been given a berth in a BCS bowl, and all they did was win the Super Bowl.

But even aside from the bizarre process of selection — with its mysterious computer polls and media/coaches polls and mathematical formulas and strength of schedule, blah, blah, blah — the most maddening aspect of this ridiculous situation is that almost half of the nation's teams are realistically excluded from the process.

In reality, the six so-called BCS conferences have guaranteed access to the BCS bowls; five conferences do not. There are 10 spots in the five BCS games, and eight of them are reserved for the BCS schools, plus independent Notre Dame, which gets preferential treatment based on tradition even though it gets pummeled annually in the postseason.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Keep Boozer send the little PF Milsap to PDX. There no future for the Jazz...

Why do some people think they need to act that way? It seems childish to me!

USU is also far, far superior to BYU or Utah in both academics and athletics....

I am replying a poster who was using the "lectures on faith", not...

Trade boozer, ak and cj. put milsap at the the 3 and get a thomas from the...

Thanks for 3 good years Paul. The Jazz gave you the chance to earn this phat...

Sweet! Don't the Dem's realize that when you crush the rich, there will be...

I want to know who said Mike did all of this? There are no facts or proof to...

Another difference is the U actually BEATS their ranked and BCS opponents....

Mormon myths mostly harmless but unnecessary

I too am glad that McKay Coppins has decided to put the whole "marriage...

Advertisements