From Deseret News archives:

'A matter of faith'

Story of the virgin birth continues to inspire as well as spark debate

Published: Monday, Dec. 18, 2006 9:54 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
To the skeptical, it's an oxymoron. To the faithful, it's a miracle or, at the very least, a faith-promoting metaphor. Two thousand years after the fact — or the fiction, depending on where you come down on the virgin birth — the story continues to inspire and confound.

Mary's virginity is now central to the Nativity story and is a staple of various Christian credos affirmed by congregations as diverse as Greek Orthodox and liberal Protestant denominations. A 2004 poll by Newsweek magazine found that 67 percent of American adults think the Christmas narrative is historically accurate, and 79 percent believe the virgin birth is literal.

But all that unanimity masks a concept fraught with nuances. Even the word "literal" is problematic, says Tom McClenahan, academic dean of the Salt Lake Theological Seminary, who prefers the word "historical" when referring to the virgin birth (by which he means the account as interpreted by the gospel writers). And too, the term "virgin birth" itself is a point of contention. Except for the Catholic Church, Christians really mean the "virgin conception," says McClenahan. (And that's not to be confused with the "immaculate conception," which is a Catholic term for the belief that Mary herself was conceived without original sin.)

Story continues below
Students at the Salt Lake Theological Seminary occasionally struggle with the notion of the virgin birth, says McClenahan. After all, they've grown up in a culture that gives priority to science over revelation — and a baby conceived by the Holy Ghost instead of a human father makes no sense, according to 21st century science.

Like much of the Bible, he says, the Nativity story should be read not as literal word-for-word or as a newspaper account; instead it's "the story as a whole" that counts. "The acceptance of this as historical is a matter of faith. It's not something that can be proved, only revealed," he says, adding that "in the end it's a question of whether we're prepared to believe in the creative power of the Spirit of God intervening in this world for the sake of our salvation from sin and evil."

Many modern Biblical scholars — most, in fact, says professor Robert J. Miller — view the story of Jesus' birth as more metaphorical than actual. The exceptions to this more symbolic interpretation, he says, are fundamentalist Christian and LDS scholars.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

2.5 million would have gotten this guys attention. This fine is like a days...

When LDS members or leaders use the word "revelation", it means precisely no...

RSL heads to MLS title game

. . . sure don't seem to be very witty.

I actually remember hearing about the Pirate Radio boat back when it...

Will state consider gay rights law?

Gays are happy, but this will not be sufficient. They will use this to...

Search : "World's Smallest Political Quiz" on any web browser. Take...

Dear Gross, Feeding babies is what breasts are for.

Sorry I hurt your feelings re:anon at 5:04. I actually had a sentence or two...

Letters: Founders not extremists

The founding fathers are NOT CONSERVATIVES by todays definitions either. ...

Letters: Founders not extremists

Let's go back to the original Presidential Election model. whoever receives...

Advertisements
Advertisement