From Deseret News archives:

Readers tell good, bad and ugly of timeshares

Published: Sunday, Nov. 26, 2006 12:17 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
"We actually have a list of disclaimers that the people go over and initial saying they understand that this is not an investment, we are not going to resell the week for them, we are not going to rent their week for them and on and on."

Siegel added, "We pride ourselves on running a very clean operation, and I would venture to say that our customer satisfaction is near perfect."

Unhappy owners

But reader Shane Honey was one who was unhappy. After reading the series and researching the resell value of the Westgate unit she had just bought, she decided to exercise her rescission rights.

"On the Internet we found this same type of condo for $30,000 less than what we paid for it. We bought it as an 'investment,' and it was told to us to be such. We feel like suckers but also feel so lucky to have your article as a great eye-opener," she said.

Chris and Johanne Cleveland of West Jordan wrote they wished the series had been written before they bought a timeshare at the Westgate Park City three years ago.

Story continues below
"Since then, we have attempted to use our 'owner' vacation amenities on several occasions, only to be informed that they were 'booked up at that time,' but we could stay for a 'special' reduced rate in an available unit. Needless to say, we were not happy and tried reselling. ... We have only met with more aggravation and expenses trying to unload our unit."

Robert Hendricksen of Kearns was among others who complained about Westgate. He said he received a call from Westgate two weeks ago offering him a weekend stay in exchange for listening to a sales pitch, but then Westgate "dropped me like a hot stone as soon as I said I was a widower."

He said while Westgate said it would sell him a timeshare, it would not give him any perks to attend because he is a widower. Hendricksen complained to the Utah Attorney General's Office and the state Department of Commerce. "Both told me it was not a case of discrimination, and they were comforted to hear that the timeshare people had some standards."

Readers had horror stories about other timeshare companies, too.

Cindy Jacobson of West Jordan wrote, "My husband and I purchased a two-bedroom timeshare for every other year at the Marriott Grand Chateau in Las Vegas in June of 2004.... The salesman tried every tactic to get us to buy, and we were about to walk away when all of a sudden he mentioned to us that Marriott will even buy our timeshare back from us at any time. So, gee, with that information, what did we have to lose? So we decided to buy it for $11,900.

"Now it's two years later, and we have tried contacting Marriott to sell our timeshare back, but they have informed us that we have to wait five to six years until all the units have sold out. Plus, it would be for about 40 percent less than what we paid for it. We were flat out lied to and feel that should be illegal."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

First off, I've heard lots of Ute fans dispute Max's story about his family....

I for one am grateful for the Police. They are there to protect us all. If...

Utes won't respond to Hall

Gee Kyle, you are so statesman like. You were just as silent last year when...

Utes won't respond to Hall

P.S. The cheerleader was a guy and kinda beat the fan down lol

Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal

OK, he shouldn't have said it, but so what??? It's a rivalry and both sides...

If Kyle or Mr Hill had any CLASS they would send a public appology to Max and...

Clearly, Max Hall made a mistake in his comments. It was a bad mistake and...

Once and for all people, there is NO BEER sold as RES. Stop saying you keep...

Max Hall issues apology

Max did nothing other than tell the truth. It's a sad state of affairs. But...

Religion in politics is tiresome

So, do you have to be "religious" to be a good person? Can one who does not...

Advertisements