From Deseret News archives:

Sun, wind replace coal?

S. California to drop Utah power for alternative energy sources

Published: Wednesday, Nov. 22, 2006 7:18 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
LOS ANGELES — Southern California is gambling its future power needs on its constant sunshine, wind and the ability of engineers to effectively harness those and other alternative energy sources.

Officials in Anaheim, Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena and Riverside notified the South Jordan-based Intermountain Power Agency this week that they would not be renewing their contracts for cheap, coal-fired power.

Those contracts expire in 2027. That leaves the cities two decades to secure the alternative energy sources they'll need — from wind farms to desert solar power.

"It's a huge change," said Mayor Todd Campbell of Burbank. The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power had already given notice to the Utah-based power agency.

The five California cities collectively purchase 75 percent of the electricity currently generated by IPA.

Reed Searle, general manager of Intermountain Power Agency Inc., said the decision by the California cities to not renew their contracts does not cause any significant concern.

"There certainly is enough sunshine and wind," Searle said. "The problem is land mass. To replace our coal facilities, for example, with solar it would take up more acres than the state of Utah has available. It can make a substantial impact, but you can't replace coal."

Story continues below
Searle went on to say that the decision puts more pressure on IPA to find new ways to reduce carbon emissions.

"We believe that technology will come along," Searle said. "The technology is probably there. It's a matter of cost."

The power agency is starting expansion to its plant near Delta, adding a 950-megawatt third generating unit, expected to be completed in 2012. Rocky Mountain Power, based in Salt Lake City, will be entitled to 37 percent of the third unit's power. Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems is claiming 51 percent and the Southern Nevada Water Authority is taking 11 percent.

The third unit will come equipped with a new device to remove most of the nitrogen oxide emissions.

"That device had never even been conceived of by the scientists when we built our last plant," Searle said. "Our new unit is likely to be one of the first to have that on it."

The moves by California could put the region in the forefront nationally of the commercial use of alternative energy in coming years, but researching and building the infrastructure to replace coal-fired power will be a costly, risky business.

"All of these technologies are still in their infancy," said Phyllis Currie, general manager of Pasadena Water & Power. "We're still looking at the fact that right now, the Intermountain plant is 65 percent of our energy."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I find it interesting that many of the same people who say that we can't...

Cougs begin bowl preparations

None of these teams is going to be easy. They all have fine football...

Max Hall issues apology

Max, no apology was necessary, but the apology was polically correct. If...

Very good piece of writing, Amy. You summarized what many of us have been...

U. eyes bowl for redemption

How is a top 25 finish make Utah a top twenty team? I think what the poster...

Max Hall issues apology

90% of the BYU & Utah fans have class, and Hall knows it. If you don't...

This might be my favorite article I've ever read from the Deseret News. Kudos.

Y. student vanished in China

Thank you for not giving up and don't give up now brother and sister...

Child prostitutes don't get help

Dr. Lois Lee's work with children who are victims of child sexual...

Look at the preview for Pixar's "Up". The whole move is summarized in...

Advertisements