From Deseret News archives:

Provo sues paving firm

City wants company to pay for sewage backup

Published: Wednesday, Nov. 1, 2006 10:58 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
PROVO — The carcass of a dog wouldn't have clogged a sewer last year if Staker & Parson Cos. hadn't paved over a manhole in northeast Provo, according to a lawsuit filed last week by the city of Provo.

The dog clog created a sewer backup that damaged 21 homes last year at a cost of $388,101.16, according to documents released by the city through a government records request. The city wants Ogden-based Staker & Parson to help foot the bill.

On Aug. 26, 2005, sewage backed into two homes near Timpview High School. City crews couldn't find the manhole at the intersection of 3750 North and Timpview Drive, so they moved north to the next manhole on 3750 North at Foothill Drive.

The crew shot water pressure down the line to dislodge the clog, but a couple of hours later, residents reported another sewer backup near 3400 North and 500 East. A city employee went down the manhole and found the dog's carcass blocking the line.

Provo Mayor Lewis Billings directed city staff to pay for the cleanup of the 18 homes damaged in the second backup. The city also made payments to residents for damages to their personal property.

Story continues below
Provo had hired Staker & Parson in 2004 to repave 3750 North and other streets in the area. The contract called for Staker & Parson to remove manholes in the streets, then cut down the road asphalt before putting down new pavement. After the paving was done, deputy city attorney David Dixon said Staker & Parson then was required to raise the manholes back to street level.

The lawsuit alleges Staker & Parson was negligent when its employees failed to raise and re-open the manhole at the intersection of 3750 North and Timpview Drive. Dixon said city crews regularly try to catch whatever is clogging a line by flushing water in at one manhole and catching the debris at the next manhole.

"We couldn't do it in this case because there wasn't a manhole," he said. "Staker & Parson surfaced over the top and nobody noticed because we didn't need to go down there until the sewer backup happened. We don't chart every manhole. That's what they get paid to do."

The suit asks that Staker & Parson be held liable for "a reasonable portion" of the costs based on the company's alleged negligence.

Company official Paul Glauser said Staker & Parson does not believe it is liable, but the company hasn't yet been served with the suit, which was filed last Thursday in 4th District Court in Provo.

"We're exploring the situation to find out the details and where our liability lies," Glauser said.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

"What in christainity could lead to the fall of an empire? The love your...

Y.'s Pitta on Mackey Award list

Article quote: "Pitta is No. 1 in the nation among tight ends in receiving...

Study: Porn hurt mind, body, heart

The ancestors are still there today. You know nothing of history....

McGrady on pace for All-Star game

Who cares about a flunky all star game anywhere?

Jazz fall apart late at L.A.

Once again Boozer make no difference. What a waste of money. Get a REAL...

BYU's Unga weighing his options

Let's be objective here. Harvey wants to play football to support his...

Gifts for gamers

Left for dead two, that family game night is fun and I like Rock Band way...

Y.'s Pitta on Mackey Award list

Hernandez won?!?!?!?!?! What are HIS stats?

I tend to agree with Erica's review. I probably wouldn't recommend "Wedding...

Solar power at a store near you?

Huh? - solar used to be complicated when it was wired with high voltage DC...

Advertisements