From Deseret News archives:

Utah candidates speak out on Iraq

Published: Thursday, Oct. 19, 2006 9:32 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
October is turning into one of the deadliest months in Iraq for U.S. troops this year — and the omnipresent question being debated in Washington is, "What do we do now?"

For Utah's 2006 congressional candidates, the answer to that question may depend on how they respond to the matter of whether the United States should have invaded Iraq in the first place.

A recent Deseret Morning News questionnaire asked candidates to tackle both issues.

Democratic Senate candidate Pete Ashdown didn't see an imminent threat in 2003 to justify invading Iraq. He added that the alternatives toward achieving a stable democracy in Iraq that were available in 2003 no longer exist. Ashdown said the United States should ask Iraq for a referendum on whether U.S. troops should stay or go.

"The best experts on Iraq are the Iraqi people," he said. "If they want us to leave, we should respect that."

Incumbent Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said he favored the invasion, pointing to a regime "in violation of international law" that had "ties to international terrorism." Hatch said further justification could be found with a government that refused to identify the whereabouts of its "claimed large quantities of weapons of mass destruction."

Story continues below
Hatch said he supports President Bush's efforts to complete efforts to develop a "secure constitutional government."

House Republican Rob Bishop, who represents the 1st District, said he wasn't in Congress when it authorized military action in Iraq, but he added that there was a "compelling legal case for action." Bishop said the focus now should be on whether the military has what it needs to complete its mission.

Bishop said the military has made "incredible" progress in Iraq and that he will rely on the military to come up with an exit strategy.

Earlier this month, the Army chief of staff, Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker, said the Army plans to keep its current level of soldiers in Iraq until 2010. Army soldiers total 120,000 of the 141,000 U.S. troops currently in Iraq.

Bishop's challenger, Steve Olsen, said he had supported "getting tough with Saddam" while recognizing the "tremendous" risks of war. Olsen added that war in Iraq has led to instability in the region.

Olsen wants the United States to continue helping Iraq with logistics, air cover, intelligence and training. But he also called for Iraqis to take over patrolling their streets and defending their country.

District 2 Republican candidate LaVar Christensen said he supported the U.S. actions in Iraq.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Hall ties Detmer's record for wins

He has done a fine job at BYU. Three very successful seasons. No, I don't...

Blind woman follows the Son

Beautiful Analogy.

Letters: Preclude the ugliness

The author says that many of us are tempted to conclude that the angry...

Man sentenced in child beating

They should lock him up in prison for the rest of his. He is only sorry...

"God said..." is not a justification for making a law. Perhaps you have read...

UNLV coach fired after 5 seasons

I don't think any u of u spawn has been successful as a head coach. Urban...

MWC expand? Get rid of deadweight

All well and good to talk of a more competitive conference, but what motive...

BYU is usually at a disadvantage playing schools with far more team speed....

Wounded Utes limp home

FSU is 5-5 overall, and just 3-4 in the very average ACC. 3 of their 5...

Williams returns to team

Shows how much you know you can't even spell his name right...its Deron. And...

Advertisements
Advertisement