Utah jury selection upheld

Judge rejects claim that Hispanics are underrepresented

Published: Monday, Oct. 2, 2006 11:34 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
PROVO — A judge ruled Monday against a defense attorney who argues that Utah's jury trials are unconstitutional because Hispanics are underrepresented in the jury pool.

In a 42-page ruling, 4th District Judge Lynn Davis denied a motion to stop jury trials for two of defense attorney Mike Esplin's clients — and potentially all defendants with pending court cases — because of Esplin's concern with the jury-selection system.

Davis' ruling said Esplin did not present enough convincing evidence that Hispanics were being systematically excluded from jury pools. However, he did acknowledge the potential impacts of the jury-pool racial inequity concern, which, if proven to be true, could bring the judicial system to a screeching halt.

"The court notes that the defendants' generic attack/criticism of the Master Jury List is a broad, global attack on the jury selection system for the entire state of Utah," Davis wrote in his ruling. "The statewide implications on the criminal justice system are enormous."

Esplin argued that racially imbalanced juries are constitutional violations of his clients' rights — the right to a jury of their peers.

Story continues below

To that end, Esplin needed to prove that, first, Hispanics are a group of the community and, second, the number of Hispanics in the jury pool is not proportional to the number of Hispanics in the community. Lastly, he also needed to show that Hispanics were being excluded during the jury-selection process.

Davis ruled Esplin failed to present enough evidence for the second and third factors.

Citing case law, Davis ruled that "defendants overestimated the number of Hispanics that are legally available for jury service."

Due to potential issues of "citizenship status and language barriers," as well as the requirement to be a naturalized citizen, Davis wrote, the number of Hispanics in Utah County does not instantly translate into the number of potential jurors.

Although Esplin's two clients are not Hispanic, they gave him permission to file the motions on their cases and agreed to the inevitable delays.

The clients, Daryl Otterson and Jacob Loveless, are awaiting trial on felony cases of sex abuse and aggravated assault charges, respectively.

Esplin said he plans to appeal Davis' ruling because he wants to see more focus dedicated to gathering demographic information about potential jury members.

"(My clients) are being denied due process (rights) because there's no way to obtain the information," he said.

The Master Jury List — kept by the Utah's Administrative Office of the Courts — is used to summon individuals for jury trials.

It is compiled from state tax records, voter registration lists and driver's license records, said Tim Shea, senior staff attorney at the Administrative Office of the Courts.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

I am confident that Glen Beck has the read the book by Gary Allen,NONE DARE...

The best thing we could do would be to get rid of all the people in DC who...

He would not pull out a whip, that's for sure. You people must read a...

Jazz brass debate Millsap match

i havent read anything about 20 mil. i read 32 to 36 mil not confirmed. 15...

Enter comment Introduzca comentario ¡¡Por Dios!! Esto no es cosa del...

When I was 16, I thought the world of my seminary teachers. They all talked...

Girls/Ladies/Women, let me first introduce reality into this discussion. In...

Obviously you don't get my point. They were non-violent resisters. They were...

PRESIDENT CLINTON was guilty of the SAME KIND OF CRIME. An older man in a...

Ah, The Religion of Peace! :-)

Advertisements