The LDS intellectual community will celebrate 40 years of independent scholarly publication tonight as some 300 supporters gather at the Grand America Hotel to laud Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. In the process, they hope to shatter some lingering perceptions about the publication among conservative Latter-day Saints.

Co-founded at Stanford University by G. Wesley Johnson and the late Eugene England after preliminary discussions in 1965, the publication has grown to both a hard-copy and an online presence, including a free public archive in the University of Utah's J. Willard Marriott Library digital collection — dialoguejournal.com/search/.

Johnson said Dialogue has become a well-respected source of information about issues affecting The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the scholarly world and is often referenced in other peer-reviewed journals both nationally and abroad. "It's a reliable source they can quote, and I think that's an accomplishment." I think we're definitely pioneers in independent publication" within the LDS community.

Before Dialogue was published, the only other reliable source for timely information about the faith was the church's own "Improvement Era," which contained little regarding wider social issues or problems in LDS society. "Given the context of the times, (such discussion) was becoming increasingly important, as the Civil Rights movement, the Vietnam War and feminism were all percolating," he said.

People of other faiths were producing independent journals to mull those issues, and Johnson saw no reason that Latter-day Saints shouldn't be doing the same.

Yet the founders and their supporters — including Richard Bushman, Stan Cazier, Dallin Oaks, Chase Peterson, Cherry Silver and Laurel Ulrich — had to fight the widespread belief at the time that such an enterprise would be "anti-Mormon" because it wasn't published or sanctioned by the church. "We said that's a fallacy."

"The first couple of years were pretty rocky," said Johnson, as many were suspicious of their activities. "Almost everyone on staff was a returned missionary. These were people who loved the church but felt it could be well-served" through an independent publication.