From Deseret News archives:

Transit loses in session

Published: Wednesday, Sept. 20, 2006 11:40 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The personal income tax cut approved in Tuesday's special session was a foregone conclusion. Some $70 million was already off the table for tax-cutting purposes and could not be appropriated elsewhere. Lawmakers also created a two-track system that allows taxpayers to pick between a flat 5.35 percent tax rate with no deductions or a higher rate with many customary deductions. The accompanying rebracketing will save families about $50 starting in the 2007 filing season.

The funding of transit, however, was far from a sure thing. Instead of a slight increase to the state sales tax, which would have provided funding for a wide variety of transportation projects — light rail, commuter rail and highways, lawmakers went with a local-option model. County commissioners can place the issue on the Nov. 7 ballot. The decision provided Salt Lake County with an alternative to raising property taxes an estimated $900 million for light-rail expansion.

A sales tax is preferable to such a large hike in property taxes, so give lawmakers their due on that front. But why not bite the bullet and seek the tax increase statewide, so that much needed transportation projects such as commuter rail, highway improvements and TRAX extensions could be expedited?

Story continues below
Perhaps lawmakers didn't want to be saddled with enabling voters to increase the state sales tax while lawmakers were approving a cut in personal income taxes. The Utah Taxpayers Association estimates the sales tax increase and the income tax hike will be a wash for taxpayers in counties that approve the sales tax. Admittedly, it's a little wishy-washy to, on the one hand, lower the sales tax rate on food statewide only to create a mechanism to increase sale taxes for transit.

Lawmakers rationalized that since 40 percent of Utahns live in Salt Lake County, local officials should decide for themselves what local projects should have priority.

That makes sense on some levels, but there is also something to be said for moving up the time line on transportation projects statewide. Commuter rail isn't as much of a priority in Salt Lake County as TRAX extensions. It's more critical to residents of Utah, Davis and Weber counties. They need to step up and commit the funds for this much-needed transportation option.

Salt Lake County residents must likewise make an investment in their transportation future because lawmakers, in an election year, prefer to cut taxes rather than authorize tax hikes.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

There is a building on the U of Penn campus named for Jon Huntsman. He has...

Whit is the best in the conference. We will be ready. Utes by 5

That's funny. Nothing like a lady to remind us that it is just highschool...

House passes health care bill

The statistics disprove the hysteria and completely idiotic view that...

12 Utes return to Texas

My sister and I prefer "STALLION" OVER "HORSE". But your right, I don't...

I agree with George Jones the New Country Music now a days is Pop music. Now...

The idea didn't come from Star Trek, Dick Tracy had a two-way wrist...

2A: Broncos vs. Wildcats

Go get em South Summit, we are pullin for ya!

Teams field good defenses

"What are Cougar fans going to say after the Utes beat TCU?" NOTHING! ...

John Pack Lambert | 12:16 p.m. Nov. 12, 2009 To the 11:55 commentator, ...

Advertisements
Advertisement