Salt Lake County tables talk of Net pact payment

Published: Wednesday, Sept. 13, 2006 9:34 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A disputed contract with the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office remains unpaid, and the county recorder is pointing to election-year politics.

The Salt Lake County Council on Tuesday tabled a discussion to pay off a $45,000 contract with SIRE Technology for off-site Web hosting. The contract was the subject of a highly publicized audit, after accusations that County Recorder Gary Ott sidestepped county contract policies to fund the project.

But four months after the audit cleared his name, Ott says the County Council is unfairly playing election-year politics to punish SIRE by not paying the bills.

"I hope it's not politically motivated, but it sure feels like it," said Ott, a Republican who is up for re-election in November. "I would hope they were above that. This is too good of a contract and too good of a company."

A vote to approve the contract failed 4-4 across party lines, with Republicans supporting the contract. Another vote to postpone the vote until next week again failed on party lines. Republican councilman David Wilde was not at the meeting and could have rendered the deciding vote.

After both votes, Democratic councilman Joe Hatch asked to table the discussion until a later time, as he said he would like to thoroughly examine the contract as well as read the full audit report, not just the summary.

Story continues below

"I'd hate to make a decision based on a full audit I haven't seen," Hatch said.

County Auditor Sean Thomas said the full audit report should be ready within the next couple of weeks.

The disputed contract goes back to November 2004, when the County Council approved $425,000 in budget requests for the recorder's office — equivalent to the amount Ott had saved through personnel cuts that year. Ott asked the council to direct $100,000 toward SIRE's off-site data management service.

That's where things got tricky. No contract was ever signed with the company. The only documentation about the off-site Web server was a quote proposal with an unsigned letter attached, stating the county would end up paying an additional $230,000 over the course of four years for the data-management project.

"It was a loose contract," Ott said. "No two ways about it. It was loose."

Ott said he has worked with the district attorney's office, the mayor's office and even the auditor's office, and formal written contract was ready for approval Tuesday.

The contract, which the county decided not to vote on, would have authorized the recorder to pay out $45,000 to now purchase SIRE's equipment, instead of continuing a lease.

"This payment was due in March," Ott said. "We have worked very hard to make this thing work. Thank goodness (SIRE) had a good year. This could have been a crippling blow."


E-mail: ldethman@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

BYU is clearly the better team of the two, they have proven that for the past...

Private property is private property. If you don't follow the wishes of the...

Jazz brass debate Millsap match

Looks like Portland is in the process of putting one over on the Jazz! We...

Whoa! This is another insane idea from this administration.

Big deal. 17 goals in 81 games is crap. He won't play in Europe so the...

I must have missed the accusation that President Clinton fondled a 16 year...

This is an absolute embarrassment and shame to the educational church...

Watching porn doesn't MAKE or turn someone into a pedophile. If that were...

While I see the point you are trying to prove here, it isn't anything like...

Fairness of BCS debated

Even Obama said he was against the BCS system. Sounds like it has...

Advertisements