From Deseret News archives:

Conference keeping its fans guessing

Published: Thursday, Aug. 31, 2006 8:48 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Welcome to Uncertainty Central, otherwise known as Mountain West Conference football.

More than the annual preseason jitters of "how's my team gonna fare this year," questions run rampant in the Mountain West.

Will an MWC team earn the new, coveted at-large BCS berth with a No. 12 ranking or by finishing ahead of a BCS conference champion? And if a team like TCU, BYU or Utah has that BCS berth all but wrapped up going into its regular-season finale, will the underdog opponent roll over and play dead "for the good of the conference" and a big payday for the league?

If the Mountain West wants to prove it can play with the BCS big boys, why isn't it? Of the MWC's three-dozen nonconference slots, only 11 — 12, if you count Air Force vs. Notre Dame — are against BCS conference foes (four vs. the Big 12, two each against the Pac-10 and ACC, and one each against the Big Ten, SEC and Big East).

Doesn't the Mountain West meeting the Western Athletic Conference in 11 games this season seem like the football equivalent of basketball's "Bracket Buster" matchups?

Story continues below
Why is the MWC playing a total of six I-AA opponents, including Weber State, Idaho State and Northern Arizona? What, was Southern Utah unavailable or demanding too big a payout?

Isn't labeling CSTV- and the mtn.-televised games as "national" and "regional" broadcasts a stretch? People outside the Wasatch Front, Colorado's Front Range and Albuquerque are going to assume CSTV is a computer science station and the mtn. is the Mother Teresa Network.

And what's up with the period after the mtn.? After getting used to the merged-word trend of PowerPoints and WordPerfects, now I have to deal with an errant dot?

Will the Mountain West on CSTV turn out like the 1984 BYU-Pitt game being the inaugural live telecast by some fledgling station called ESPN? Or like ESPN's tractor-pull and arm-wrestling competitions?

Wouldn't Air Force prefer attention given to football successes instead of the glare of the Academy's past sexual-assault and Christian-coercion controversies, coach Fisher DeBerry's ill-advised '05 comments and an assistant hitting a player in summer practice? And will the option-minded Falcons go back to being "bad to the 'bone" rather than again force an aerial attack?

Given the ongoing Middle East conflicts, isn't BYU's marketing slogan of "Weapons of Mass Destruction" a little tacky? (But since the Cougars started it ... what happens if no WMDs are found? Or if it all blows up in their face?) And will 2006 mark the Cougars' first winning season since 2001 and first win over a ranked foe since mid-September 1999?

Has Colorado State learned how to stop the run?

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

When Boozer was shooting the free throws, why Sloan didn't substitute Mathew...

Letters: Global warming a lie

actions, I will be forced to be accountable for them. I refuse. I am an...

What's with the Utah fans flashing the double L sign?

@mark: So Sam da Ham... you were just making it up?" I'm a climate...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

"I have no idea why BYU fans are talking smack about bowl opponents. Even if...

TCU versus BSU unpopular

You say to "quit whining and play somebody." Isn't that what everyone is...

BoM translation remarkably consistent

Reading these comments, I start wondering-- Whatever happened to faith? Why...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

All those numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...

BYU eager for crack at Oregon State

All thos numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...

So Sam da Ham, when you said this: "Not so. Al Gore is poised to make...

Advertisements