From Deseret News archives:

A bad anti-leak bill

Published: Sunday, Aug. 13, 2006 11:01 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The federal government is home to an ever-growing mountain of classified information. A good deal of it is trivial, dated or mundane. Some of it is of vital national importance.

The government already has the power to prosecute officials who knowingly leak information that harms national security, just as it can punish people in trusted positions who leak secret codes or military information or, as was alleged in the Valerie Plame case, the names of people acting undercover.

So there is little justification for a bill Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., has filed. It would punish any current or former government worker, or even civilian contractor, who leaks anything that is classified. The penalty would be either a fine or up to three years in prison, or both.

Story continues below
We have no quarrel with giving strong prison sentences to people who legitimately harm national security, but this bill doesn't address national security. Prosecutors could go after anyone who leaks anything from the growing mound of classified information without having to prove that the nation was harmed. It would put most government information, and its dissemination, in the hands of the executive branch. This nation's tradition always has been one of favoring free-flowing information, under the premise that it pays to be skeptical of those in power.

This bill was tried before, and it was vetoed by then-President Bill Clinton. As usual, its proponents are throwing out dire warnings about leaks that are compromising the nation at a time of war, as well as a good measure of assurances that the bill won't punish reporters or news outlets who publish leaked information — only the official people who do the leaking.

That's scant reassurance at a time when prosecutors and judges are aggressively requiring reporters to turn over notes, tapes and other information in an effort to get at leakers. When the government erects fortified walls around the things it does and releases only that which makes it look good, the public ultimately suffers.

Interestingly, the list of co-sponsors of this bill includes Orrin Hatch and Bob Bennett, Utah's two senators. We're sorry to see that. The bill is little more than an emotional rant that goes way beyond what is needed to protect legitimate national secrets.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I desire that we be fiscally correct. We spend more per capita than anyone...

Condolences to the victims families.

No mention of "climate gate", researchers cooking the books... no pun intended

Chase ends with arrest, pot bust

Using the aggressive force of the State against the transport of plant...

Climate drama climax looks elusive

Was this written by professional journalists? The sweeping generalizations...

no matter how many games the ewets win they will always be losers because of...

I have heard sooo much liberal sprew for the past twenty years on major...

Utah's Wynn healing up

Utah loses half their starters to gradutation and you drunkards call it a...

Will Harpring be missed?

I doubt anyone in utah heard it since it was on the denver feed, but the...

You would expect negative comments from professors as they are often out of...

Advertisements