From Deseret News archives:

Shop owners are wary of plans

Sugar House firms worry about being pushed out

Published: Wednesday, Aug. 2, 2006 11:49 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The shops that line Highland Drive between 2100 South and Sugarmont Drive in Sugar House are a mishmash of local businesses peddling a variety of products, cobbled together under a series of awnings.

The street is rare in Salt Lake City, with only a few other districts like it — 900 South and 900 East, 1500 South and 1500 East and 300 South downtown, for instance. It draws crowds of pedestrians who stroll between window fronts examining T-shirts, stickers, coffee menus, lingerie and furniture.

The collection of small local retailers and the old buildings in which they operate could be in jeopardy, though, to future redevelopment of what's known informally as the Granite Furniture block, the land bordered by 2100 South, Highland Drive, Sugarmont Drive and McClelland Street.

The Salt Lake City Council voted last December to change zoning on the block to allow between seven and eight stories. That vote alone doesn't endanger the businesses, but Councilman Soren Simonsen, who lives in Sugar House and joined the council in January after the vote, thinks that the zoning doesn't do much to protect the old buildings and small retailers who may be passed over if the property owners decide to redevelop their block.

Story continues below
Four major landowners on the block are in early talks about redeveloping the block, and no one in city government or in the Sugar House community council has seen official plans. Craig Mecham, one of the four landlords, said no one has seen plans yet because there are no plans to see.

The conflict, as Simonsen sees it, is that pressure on Mecham and other property owners to redevelop at higher density and earn more money doesn't leave much room for historic preservation and local tenants.

"The Sugar House master plan from 2001 has a significant goal of historic preservation both of neighborhoods and business district," Simonsen said. "There is no provision in the current zoning ordinance that ether provides an incentive or any kind of policy with regard to historic preservation."

He also believes that preserving some of the area's older buildings might leave more room for tenants who couldn't afford high-priced rents in a brand-new building.

Kirk Huffaker, the interim executive director of the Utah Heritage Foundation, said that balancing property rights with the dual goals of preservation and promoting local businesses will be a trial for Simonsen and the rest of the City Council.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Shops along the west side of Highland Drive are run by small local retailers.

previousnext

Latest comments

I'ts not sloan that keeps some biggies in the league not wanting to come...

Letters: No constitutional right

Once the leftist leaders have convinced ENOUGH of the population that...

I haven't been able to get this out of my mind. It truly is the stuff of...

9 bear cubs headed back to woods

Why is the division of wildlife releasing the cubs at this time of year? As...

BYU football: 5 keys to victory

Utah 73 BYU 0

Maybe she hit him in the head with a golf club. Hope she didn't run the...

Congratulations on your win over BYU! I knew Utah was going to beat BYU...

LDS members are in the MLB spreading the gospel, and if Nash does happen to...

especially since SUU lost 4 seniors last year. They have no idea what the...

Editorial: Food is not the enemy

My first question to you is, "How much do you weigh?" Second, "If you are...

Advertisements