From Deseret News archives:

New friend U.S. Chamber touts Matheson in TV ads

Published: Tuesday, Aug. 1, 2006 4:51 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The chamber ranks each congressman according to several dozen votes. Matheson sided with the chamber position 23 times out of 32 votes the business group deemed important. That's more than a 70 percent "correct" voting record, according to the chamber.

But Matheson said he didn't know those 32 positions before the votes. "Some groups send over a fax or something to let you know their position. But, anyway, you never know those (position-ranking) votes until much later."

Christensen said the national chamber's TV ad is a perfect example of how Matheson has disingenuously "orchestrated the pursuit of certain endorsements" in an effort to fool 2nd District voters into believing he's conservative, when in fact he is not.

"On a local level, I've gotten awards for standing with Utah taxpayers," said Christensen, R-Draper. "Jim received a 'D' grade from the National Taxpayers Union — and that is a more telling" stand on where Matheson really is on fiscal and pro-business matters, Christensen added. The NTU Web site says Matheson voted with the union's positions just 37 percent of the time.

An attorney and developer, Christensen said he better understands Utah business needs than does Matheson.

Story continues below
"I'm actually out there working in the local business community. Jim asks these groups: What do I have to do to get your endorsement, and then he votes as he needs to on a few bills" to get it, he said.

Matheson denies that he votes any specific way to get endorsements. But he's pleased to get support from such a well-known national group. Two years ago, Matheson was one of about 20 Democrats endorsed by the chamber, compared to more than 200 GOP candidates supported by the chamber.

The chamber's pro-Matheson ad shows groups of senior citizens and then compliments Matheson on voting for the Bush-backed Medicare prescription drug package.

"TV is expensive, I certainly couldn't run ads now" and afford to stay on TV through November's final election, Matheson said.

"You won't see any (Matheson-paid-for) TV ads until later in the fall," the three-term congressman said.

Running for the first time in 2000, Matheson said he saw the U.S. Chamber spend about $250,000 in TV ads criticizing him. Those ads wrongly misstated his stand on a senior citizen drug insurance plan, Matheson complained at the time. Matheson demanded that local TV stations take the chamber ad off the air, saying it was scandalous and inaccurate.

The chamber then changed the ad, demanding that Matheson take a stand on prescription drug benefits. Matheson responded that he had taken such a stand.

Two years later, in Matheson's first re-election bid, the chamber switched and supported the Utah Democrat, providing campaign cash.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

How about putting as much of the service online as possible?

So the standard is that if it is good for the economy, we should do it? Wow....

Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing

And protest farm subsidies because that is your money being given to pay...

Bronco should have said this a LONG time ago. He could have helped to put the...

The SLC media will ride this horse to its grave. I still haven't heard an...

See you on the ballot next election. Maybe you could found the imbecile free...

Letters: Unasked questions

Ron, you can spin this any way you like, but the fact remains, your...

Professorship (I hope) does give one greater knowledge and insight into a...

BYU football: Bronco weighs in on Hall

Bronco, this should have been said days ago. And I appreciate...

Letters: Health care scam

Shirley, you think implementation can turn on a dime? It shows woeful...

Advertisements