From Deseret News archives:

House passes civil rights bill

Renewal moves forward despite Southern conservative objections

Published: Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:11 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
"By passing this rewrite of the Voting Rights Act, Congress is declaring from on high that states with voting problems 40 years ago can simply never be forgiven," said Rep. Lynn Westmoreland, R-Ga., one of several lawmakers pressing for changes to the law to ease its requirements on Southern states.

The House overwhelmingly rejected amendments that would have shortened the renewal from 25 years to a decade and would have struck its requirement that ballots in some states be printed in several languages.

Supporters of the law as written called the amendments "poison pills" designed to kill the renewal because if any were adopted by the full House, the underlying renewal might have failed.

Supporters used stark images and emotional language to make clear that the pain of racial struggle — and racist voting practices — still stings.

Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., displayed photos of civil rights activists, including himself, who were beaten by Alabama state troopers in 1965 as they marched from Selma to Montgomery in support of voting rights.

"I have a concussion. I almost died. I gave blood; some of my colleagues gave their very lives," Lewis shouted from the House floor, while the Rev. Jesse Jackson, another civil rights veteran, looked on from the gallery.

Story continues below
"Yes, we've made some progress; we have come a distance," Lewis added. "The sad truth is, discrimination still exists. That's why we still need the Voting Rights Act and we must not go back to the dark past."

The very debate over changes to the act is testament to the influence of Southern conservatives, even over their own GOP leaders who had hoped to pass the renewal as a fresh appeal for support from minorities on Election Day.

With rare bipartisan support among leaders of the House and Senate, the renewal was widely expected to sail through Congress and on to the White House for President Bush's signature.

Republican leaders, however, were forced to cancel a House vote last month when conservatives rebelled during a closed meeting against provisions they contended singled out Southern states for federal oversight despite the civil rights progress they had made in recent years.

Unable to satisfy the dissenters and eager to pass the bill this week, Republican leaders announced late Wednesday they would allow the House to consider amendments, none of which passed.

The amendment that would have extended the act for a decade, rather than the 25 years in the bill, was rejected 288-134. The proposal to strike requirements in the law that ballots in districts with large populations of non-English speakers be printed in other languages failed 238-185.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Shouting side effects?

Fox has but one goal. To demonize the left by talking about the left again,...

Im apalled at why Billy Phillips is not a member of first team all state....

Hey Max Hall.....did you happen to catch Tim Tebow's post game comments after...

If you are one defending Beck then I guess you can read minds just like he...

He has not abandoned his daughter with a disability. I have known his family...

Letters: Shouting side effects?

The America that voted the neocons out of power last election is not the...

The law doesn't sleep at 1 in the morning. Just because its late, doesn't...

Letters: Applaud 'green people'

I agree with lost in DC that people wlll happily argue that lost in DC is not...

Objective reporting went of style with the Liberal media..doesn't matter what...

Matthews passes new Jazz tests

The Jazz brass sid know what they were doing when they invited Wes to Pre...

Advertisements